theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re:WQ Judge and the dead Blavatsky/K Tingley and the discarnate Judge

Feb 23, 1998 07:52 AM
by M K Ramadoss


All of us are interested in the historial matters relating to all
Theosophical pioneers. Please keep us informed and post any questions you
may have and some one who has the info may be able to respond.

mkr
=================================

At 07:32 AM 2/23/98 PST, you wrote:
>JHE,
>What is problem?  Since last
>fall I've been reading & studying W
>Judge.  I've purchased books, recd
>material thru inter-library sharing,
>& yes, I've asked for help
>in locating material
>on this forum. Persons senting
>public & private messages to me
>have been helpful.  Some extremely
>generous.  But you are exception.
>You dislike my questions
>& accuse me of wanting
>you to do my research. Now you
>give new accusation. If you
>dont want to share info then
>DONT SHARE. But why do you write
>what appears to me as insulting &
>condescending comments.
>Several theosophists have copied
>rare books on W Judge for me.
>No charge. They
>didn't lecture me but helped.
>One man emailed me you have library &
>archives of Judge material.  I
>wonder how open & accessible your
>material is when you can write such
>unfriendly postings?
>
>I close unpleasant subject.I thank
>everyone who's given info &
>material & I'll continue to
>post documents as I find & rec. them.
>I also plan to create web site
>when I learn HTML.  Any recommendations
>on good web site provider?
>
>D Green
>
>>Dear David,
>>
>>Obviously,  you are not only trying to get me to do your research for
>>you, but you are also trying to manipulate me into a debate with some
>>party not known to me.  Sorry, but I'm not interested in playing your
>>game.  Find another sucker to entertain you and to do your work for
>>you.  Regarding the Rajah/Judge issue, read my last VERY carefully, and
>>you will find that I was not saying that Judge was not identified as
>>Rajah.  I'll leave it to you to figure out what that means.  If you
>>can't, then I'm sorry about that too.
>>
>>JHE
>>
>>
>>David Green wrote:
>>
>>> I recd. 4 emails from
>>> readers who declare
>>> W Judge was known as----Rajah.
>>> Among references were
>>> "Theosophy"---May 1896----
>>>
>>> "the Rajah---as the real
>>> W.Q.J. was so often called"
>>> wrote "T."
>>> &
>>> "He was called by some
>>> The Rajah."
>>> wrote E Neresheimer.
>>>
>>> I don't possess Theosophy
>>> journal but J Belcher
>>> promises to send issues
>>> of April thru June 1896
>>> full of tribute
>>> articles on W Judge
>>> soon after his death.
>>>
>>> I quote from another corresp. The
>>> note has relevant details------
>>>
>>> >collating the material.  Yes, he thinks he
>>> >knows the esoteric truth about W.Q.J. but he
>>> >can't even get the exoteric, historical facts
>>> >straight!  Judge was residing in New York in
>>> >early Jan. 1895 (PATH magazine Feb. 1895 documents this).
>>> >He was also known to his intimates as Rajah.
>>> >(I will send you one E.S.T. circular of 1896
>>> >showing this.)  Also he confuses a *printed*
>>> >circular with a *handwritten* letter. There's more!
>>> >Be sure to write John.  I think I gave you his
>>> >address in my last.  He has a treasure
>>> >chest of W.Q.J.'s papers.  He will be straight
>>> >with you and won't give you that kind of
>>> >crap about too esoteric. I'll photocopy the items
>>> >you requested and send airmail Monday.  Also you
>>>
>>> More W Judge/Mrs Blavatsky
>>> documents to follow. Have
>>> decided to have web site
>>> with all W Judge papers
>>> I can find on these
>>> matters.
>>>
>>> D Green
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>



[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application