theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

No humans allowed

Jun 22, 1998 10:47 PM
by Kym Smith


Brenda wrote to me:

>I'm very glad you can withstand this pain of writing to strangers.

Due to my astuteness, I know that your statement, in some wicked and
hell-born way, is supposed to be a poke at me.  I am crushed. . .grieved. .
.wait - I need a moment before I can go on. . .your words. . .your words are
like tiny, sharp, gleaming knives. . .stabbing and hacking away at my heart
and soul.  Oh!

All righty - I'm over it now.  Let's move on, shall we?


>Well, let's just imagine that someone (even me, perhaps) receives a
>"Command" from someone (like I like to refer to them) in the next kingdom
>of nature - an ascended master, one who is as far above my conscious
>ability as I am above the dinosaur.

Well now, this would all depend on JUST HOW FAR you are above the
consciousness of the dinosaur before I could get all goose-bumpy with awe
over such a "Command."

>YOU TRY TO GET IT RIGHT.  To me it
>would seem like interpreting and translating as many times as there are
>languages on earth!!!

So, using your example, the odds are that the "Command" would be so garbled
due to the huge probability of error in the translation that to heed
anything from it would be rather goofy, wouldn't you think?

>In other words, this is not human speaking to human.

Does "this" mean the "ascended one talking to Brenda" or "Brenda talking to
Kym?"

> Comprendez?

Oui.


Kym






[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application