Theos-Talk Archives (November 1998 Message tt00348)

What about Alaister Crowleys idea of Demarchy (It may be someone elses idea
but I read of it in his works) and Kim Il Sungs Juche principle?

Any thoughts on these?

Darren


At 08:57 AM 11/19/98 EST, you wrote:
>In a message dated 11/19/98 3:41:21 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>LeonMaurer@aol.com writes:
>
><< Capitalism, today, has become no different in its motivation (with the
same
> elitist people behind it) than the fascism and Nazism it forcefully
overthrew
> yesterday--except it's a lot stronger militarily, and its dirty tricks a bit
> more sophisticated >>
>
>Any form of Statism is oppressive as we have seen in the
>heavy hand of communism and socialism, i,e, command
>economies that make a million shoes for the left foot but
>none for the right.  Mussolini was a Socialist before he created
>his own brand of it - fascism - and National SOCIALISM is
>just that .... with racism thrown in.
>
>Rudolph Steiner defined Lucifer as restless activity on the
>spiritual plane leading to illusion.  He said Ahriman is the heavy hand
>of dead letter materialism.  Anthropos, Man, the fully integrated
>man, is the balancing equilibrium between the two.  What
>he was really talking about were the three Gunas.  He said that
>national socialism is luciferic and communism is ahrimanic.
>The Nazis were interested in the dark side of the occult
>(luciferic) while the Communists promoted the oppressive
>bureaucratic state (like in George Orwell's *1984*).  Both
>systems desired to mold man/woman into automatons of the
>State, mindless androids serving the Party Programme, i.e.,
>the Aryan superman for the Nazis and the Homo Sovieticus
>for the Commies.
>
>Participatory democracy with a free enterprise system seems
>OK to me.  I'm glad the Lords of Karma placed me here the USA
>in this incarnation.  It ain't perfect but it's better than most.
>
>Augoeides
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>