Theos-Talk Archives (April 2000 Message tt00020)

Dear Martin:

At 08:05 AM 4/12/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>Dear Ramadoss,
>
>Would you clarify the point brought up by someone (David) when he wrote: "He
>>should have known Krishnamurti was not Master Maitreya.
>
>I never heard that. What I was told is the K. was going to be the "vehicle"
>for the World Teacher. Something like Jesus and the Christ.
>Please tell us if you know about it.  They are very different matter.

You are right. He was supposed to be vehicle to be used by the World Teacher.

>I have no doubt CWL was clairvoyant.
>I challenge anyone to select one child in India to later become a great
>philosopher to  millions; one whose books (from his talks, etc) and memories
>has lifted their souls to a true understanding of the mental process and life
>realities.

Identifying K was a very remarkable find of CWL and all the credit goes to
him.

One time K was questioned about his views on CWL's clairvoyance. 

K's comment was that CWL was temporarily clairvoyant. Since he had known
CWL  well, I put some credence on K's statement.

Yes many got introduced to Theosophy due to CWL's works and the credit goes
to him.

mkr


-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.