Theos-Talk Archives (May 2000 Message tt00020)

"W. Dallas TenBroeck" wrote:

> <SNIP>
>
> Compared to HPB's WISDOM-LIGHT,  AND THE LIGHT OF THE MASTERS,
> ALL OUR "KNOWLEDGE" INCLUDING THAT OF RAGHAVAN IYER, PALES INTO A
> MERE CANDLELIGHT.

I'm not interested in someone's personal as you say, "Wisdom-Light,"
only in light.  Doesn't matter
if it belongs to HPB or is the so called, "Light of the Masters."  I
want light experienced as a subject
not as an object.  To attach to others' light as we here appear to be
attached to HPB's WISDOM LIGHT
is to invite the fall.  Attach = fall.



> We are in no position to make comparisons or to proclaim things
> on behalf of another that we have not PROVED nor can we PROVE
> them.

If we are in no position to compare then why did you just do so?  I
apologize
if I offended anybody on this list.  From personal experience I KNOW
that
anything I say with regard to Theosophy is a mere footnote at best,
moonlight
compared to what I have seen, heard and read from R.N. Iyer.



<SNIP>

>
>
> That is the ULT way. NO ONE may make any claims at all.  See
> again what the DECLARATION states.

One wonders if, whether or not you even remember what you have written.
"Compared to HPB's WISDOM LIGHT blah, blah, blah."


Spencer

>
begin:vcard 
n:Kellogg;Spencer
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:kellogg@west.net
x-mozilla-cpt:;1
fn:Spencer Kellogg
end:vcard