theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: Theos-World Re: Adepts or Masters?

Jul 26, 2001 06:25 PM
by nos


Out of Interest - what is the Dalai Llama considered as if not a
Bodhisattva and Master?

Nos



##-----Original Message-----
##From: Blavatsky Archives [mailto:blavatskyarchives@yahoo.com] 
##Sent: Friday, 27 July 2001 5:12 AM
##To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
##Subject: Theos-World Re: Adepts or Masters?
##
##
##Dallas you wrote:
##
##"No Adept will ever claim to be one, nor will any one
##who has actually encountered an Adept ever mention the event 
##in public, or claim the acquaintance."
##
##Dallas, do you really mean it when you write that no one "who has 
##ACTUALLY encountered an Adept [will] ever mention the event in 
##public, or claim the acquaintance"? Caps added.
##
##How do you come up with statements like this? I really am 
##truly puzzled. 
##
##If you look in my book "The Esoteric World of Madame Blavatsky" you 
##will see public accounts written by HPB, Damodar, Ramaswamier, 
##Olcott, Casava Pillai, William Brown, Franz Hartmann and others of 
##their encounters with Adepts and Masters. All these individuals 
##claimed the "acqaintance" of the Masters. If we take your dictim at 
##face value, then should we discount the testimony of all these 
##individuals including that of HPB?
##
##Daniel
##
##
##
##
## 
##
##Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
##http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
##
##



[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application