". . . against the character of a person who is dead . . . ."
Dec 13, 2001 06:59 PM
by danielhcaldwell
Dallas, you wrote:
"I further say that it is an act of cowardice to advance something
against the character of a person who is dead and is unable to refute
it currently."
Dallas, I don't understand your reasoning in this statement.
If I write a book on Hitler and advance a whole list of things
against his character, does that mean I have engaged in an "act of
cowardice"?
Are you actually saying that once Hitler was dead, no honorable
person should ever write anything "negative" about him even if we
have the evidence to support what is written?
I guess you would also include Dr. Gregory Tillett among
the "cowards" who have advanced quite negative things about C.W.
Leadbeater? Mr. Leadbeater was not alive and could not refute the
various statements made in the Tillett biography of Leadbeater.
I would be interested to know your thoughts about this.
Daniel
http://hpb.cc
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
