Theos-Talk Archives (January 2002 Message tt00094)

Steve Stubbs wrote:

> Daniel:
> 
> I think you need to read the e-mail again. No, I am
> not quoting Deveney. I read Randolph's stuff many
> years before Deveney published his book. As stated,
> Blavatsky claimed to be associated with the
> Brotherhood of Luxor, which was not called that, and
> which was clearly Randolph's "Rosicrucian
> Brotherhood."

So is the "evidence" you're referring to in the following posting?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/4525

Daniel
http://hpb.cc