theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Larry on the "law of witnesses"

Mar 06, 2002 09:13 PM
by danielhcaldwell


Larry, you hit the nail right on the head with your following remarks:

"I wonder why the 'law of witnesses' works in law but not here. We 
send people to jail every day, yes, and some even to their death 
because of corroborating evidence. Yet you call out from the dust the 
testimony of witness after witness and all you get is 'where's the 
proof'. I thought the testimony of witnesses WAS proof." 

No doubt Brigitte Muehlegger will ignore this point that you bring up 
as she does so many other points.

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://blavatskyarchives.com/introduction.htm
"...Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at
their right value; and unless a judge compares notes and
hears both sides he can hardly come to a correct decision."
H.P. Blavatsky. The Theosophist, July, 1881, p. 218.












[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application