Theos-Talk Archives (March 2002 Message tt00517)

Bill, you wrote:

"Daniel, I see again that you simply will not address the remainder 
of my post which I resent a second time to you. If you could just 
answer my post by copying it in its entirety and going through 
addressing each section and comment individually, I would be most 
grateful. A big OK after each section would suffice if you agree 
with what I have written I think."

Bill, I appreciate your latest email that begins with the above 
material but my only comments will be on your hypothesis 6. 
Everything else not directly related to that subject is really off 
the subject of the orginal post that you answered. I don't see that 
much will be gained by trying to answer each and every side comment 
of yours. 

To make some half-way intelligent remarks on your hypothesis 6, I am 
going to have to compare your Hyp. 6 with what Johnson, Muehlegger 
and Stubbs have written on the same subject. This may take some time 
but I will return to the subject when I have sufficient time to think 
about the central issues that you have raised.

Daniel