Theos-Talk Archives (September 2002 Message tt00131)

A friend of mine forwarded the information below.
As HPB made several clear warnings and predictions on the misleading way our
Western "civilization" goes me thought this information on the recent, most
tragic and most serious development with the hawks in Washington D.C. and
Tel Aviv may interest Blavatsky students on this list, too.
If the following information ic correct that the attack on Iraq is an old
plan 1996 Israel plan then there is a logic why Bush Jr. was enthroned as
President from the E.S. Illuminates, no matter what the voters wanted and
why 11/9 happened and happened that way.
Frank
--------------------------------------------------


The Impending "Clash of Civilizations"


Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
Executive Intelligence Review
September 20, 2002

Lyndon LaRouche reports that there is now firm
evidence that the ongoing drive to induce President
George W. Bush to launch a war against Iraq is a 1996
Israeli government policy that is being foisted on the
President by a nest of Israeli agents inside the U.S.
government.

This Israeli spy network inside the United States was
unable to achieve their objective until President Bush
was entrapped by the events of Sept. 11, 2001 and the
falsified accounts of those events provided by this
foreign intelligence apparatus, and lured over to
their policies. Lyndon LaRouche demands to know: Is
this not the motive that explains the who and why of
the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001? LaRouche demands an
immediate Congressional investigation to help purge
the U.S. government of this foreign intelligence
apparatus, which attempted, with the 9/11 events, to
seize control over U.S. foreign policy. The network of
Pollard "stay-behinds" inside the Bush Administration
is engaged in a witting hoax to induce the President
and the U.S. Congress to go to war.

When you read the summary evidence below, you will
certainly share Lyndon LaRouche's conclusion that all
of these people must be immediately fired from their
Administration posts, and that the U.S. Congress must
launch public hearings to get to the bottom of this
criminal scheme.

The summary facts are as follows:

On July 8, 1996, Richard Perle, now the Chairman of
the Defense Policy Board, an advisory group that
reports to Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz,
presented a written document to Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, spelling out a new Israeli foreign
policy, calling for a repudiation of the Oslo Accords
and the underlying concept of "land for peace"; for
the permanent annexation of the entire West Bank and
Gaza Strip; and for the elimination of the Saddam
Hussein regime in Baghdad, as a first step towards
overthrowing or destabilizing the governments of Syria,
Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Iran. The document was
prepared for the Jerusalem and Washington, DC-based
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies
(IASPS), a think tank financed by Richard Mellon-
Scaife. The report, "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm," was co-authored by Perle; Douglas
Feith, currently the Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Policy; David Wurmser, currently special assistant
to State Department chief arms control negotiator John
Bolton; and Meyrav Wurmser, now Director of Mideast
Policy at the Hudson Institute.

Two days after he received the foreign policy
blueprint from Perle, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu
delivered a speech before a joint session of the U.S.
Congress, which strongly echoed the IASPS outline. The
same day, the Wall Street Journal published excerpts
from the IASPS document, and the next day, July 11,
1996, the Journal editorially endorsed the Perle
document.

Beginning in February 1998, the British government of
Prime Minister Tony Blair launched a concerted effort,
in league with the Netanyahu government in Israel, and
the Perle Israeli agent-of-influence networks inside
the United States, to induce President William Clinton
to launch a war against Iraq, under precisely the
terms spelled out for Netanyahu in the "Clean Break"
paper. The war was to be launched, ostensibly, over
Iraq's possession of "weapons of mass destruction."
United Nations weapons inspectors were, at this time,
still on the ground inside Iraq.

To buttress the war drive, British Foreign Secretary
Robin Cook issued an official lying "white paper" on
the Iraqi drive to obtain WMD. On Feb. 19, 1998,
Richard Perle and former Congressman Stephen Solarz
released an "Open Letter to the President," demanding
a full- scale U.S.-led drive for "regime change" in
Baghdad. The dangerously incompetent military scheme
for the overthrow of Saddam that was published in the
Open Letter has been recently revived by the Perle-
led network of "chickenhawks" in the office of
Secretary of Defense-- but has been summarily rejected
by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Among the signators on
the original Perle-Solarz letter were the following
current Bush Administration officials: Elliott Abrams
(National Security Council), Richard Armitage (State
Department), John Bolton (State Department), Doug
Feith (Defense Department), Fred Ikle (Defense Policy
Board), Zalmay Khalilzad (White House), Peter Rodman
(Defense Department), Donald Rumsfeld (Secretary of
Defense), Paul Wolfowitz (Defense Department), David
Wurmser (State Department) and Dov Zakheim (Defense
Department).

President Clinton rejected the February 1998 demand
for war, sending both Netanyahu and Blair into fits of
rage.

On Aug. 6, 1998, Angelo Codevilla, the Washington, DC
co-director of IASPS (along with David Wurmser),
penned an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, demanding
the freeing of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard.
Codevilla argued that Pollard had been right to pass
U.S. classified material to Israel, because of the
threat posed by Saddam Hussein. Days later, two
members of the Netanyahu cabinet contacted Vice
President Al Gore, demanding Pollard's release.

After again rejecting the Netanyahu and Blair demands
for war on Iraq in November 1998, President
Clinton--under the impeachment onslaught, led by the
Mellon-Scaife-funded apparatus--finally caved in and
authorized Operation Desert Fox in December 1998, as
he was returning on Air Force One from a visit to
Israel. But the 70 days of bombardment did not
eliminate the Saddam Hussein regime, and the issue
remained dormant for the next three years ... until
Sept. 11, 2001.

Within moments of the 9/11 attack on Washington and
New York, the same Pollard-linked American networks
who had designed the Netanyahu foreign policy were on
the warpath, demanding that President Bush go to war
against Iraq, despite the fact that, to this day,
there is no plausible evidence linking Iraq to the
September 2001 irregular warfare attacks. The Sharon
government in Israel instantly declared that the
attack had been ordered by Saddam Hussein, and called
for massive retaliation against Baghdad.

On Sept. 22, 2001, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
Wolfowitz made a feverish pitch for war on Iraq at a
Camp David meeting with President Bush and most of the
Cabinet. Wolfowitz had been brought into the inner
circle of George W. Bush a year before the 2000
Presidential elections, at the initiative of former
Secretary of State George Shultz. By 1999, Wolfowitz
and Condi Rice had become co-responsible for pulling
together the Bush campaign foreign policy and national
security team, which Ms. Rice dubbed "The Vulcans."
Wolfowitz immediately brought "X Committee" Israeli
agent-of-influence Richard Perle into the inner
sanctum, from where he has been peddling the
Netanyahu-Israeli foreign policy agenda from day one.
Perle most recently staged the July 10, 2002 Defense
Policy Board session, which demanded the purging of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff of all opponents of the Iraq
war, and called for a U.S. military occupation and
takeover of the Saudi oil fields and a total break
with the House of Saud-- just as his July 1996 IASPS
"Clean Break" study had proposed.

This is but the briefest of summaries of the massive
evidence in hand. The current campaign to induce
President Bush and the U.S. Congress into a war with
Iraq, one that would surely unleash the "Clash of
Civilizations," is a direct continuation of the
Pollard affair. President Bush is being
pressured--from inside his own national security
apparatus--to adopt an Israeli Likud foreign policy!
What nation is dictating policy to the United States?
This is a scandalous hoax far worse than the Gulf of
Tonkin affair of the late 1960s.

>From the point that Perle, Feith, the Wurmsers, et al.
first delivered the "Clean Break" policy to Netanyahu,
this crowd has been obsessed with inducing the United
States government to adopt and implement it. All prior
efforts failed, until Sept. 11, 2001 created a new
context for reviving and pushing it--under the guise
of the "war on terrorism." Does this raise questions
about the true, mysterious authors of the 9/11 attack?
What are the links between the events of Sept. 11 and
the subsequent unabated drive for war against Iraq?

>From Perle and Feith, to others pressing the Netanyahu
scheme from outside the Administration--including
Frank Gaffney, Steven Bryen and Michael Ledeen--the
entire crew were among the leading suspected Israeli
spies, tasking Jonathan Pollard to steal the most
precious national security secrets of the U.S.A., from
inside the Reagan-Bush national security apparatus.
They avoided prosecution, and later emerged as "The
Vulcans," assigned to "teach" President Bush the ins
and outs of foreign and national security policy.
Isn't it time that these co-conspirators joined
Jonathan Pollard behind bars? Isn't it time for
President Bush to give these clowns a "September
Surprise"?