Theos-Talk Archives (October 2002 Message tt00042)

Wiith reference to the differences between the teachings of HPB and AAB, You 
might also refer to the following article:
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/HPBvsAB.html 

In a message dated 10/06/02 5:01:11 AM, global-theosophy@adslhome.dk writes:

>Hi Suzanne and all of you,
>
>Thanks for your kind words.
>
>I did have a problem with the last part of your letter.
>Suzanne wrote:
>"In my mind, there is very little conflict between HPB and AAB, both
>of their "systems" of thinking are striving to reach the same goal,
>but are using slightly different paths."
>
>My view:
>It is allright, that this view is yours, but I have to say, that to me
>it is clearly not a 'very little conflict' when we talk in 
>general terms , - although everything is relative. You see it is so
>, that some are reading Alice A. Baileys books like they stem from
>evil forces. And because that kind of reading and interpretation are -
>relatively easy and possible - there really is a conflict there, 
>on certain levels, also theosophically speaking. No doubt there.
>
>I can suggest those who are interested in the issue
>H. P. Blavatsky versus Alice A. Bailey to read some of the very interesting
>articles and links at
>http://www.esotericastrologer.org/AABHPBHR.htm (author Philip Lindsay)
>The friendly fellow has posted an article of mine with my until now official
>view on the matter.
>