theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Alice Bailey didn't knowingly copy from other books.

Nov 13, 2002 07:51 AM
by brianmuehlbach


Alice Bailey did not copy from other books when she wrote the 
voluminous works of "D.K." they where clearly written fluently and in 
that sence her books are genuine (but in her biography she admitted to 
have read Theosophical books all day for a period, while she was 
cooking, ironing and so on) so did "Helene Smith" not copy from any 
known script her "Martian writings" written fluently in front of witnesses. 

So there are logical explanations where the content of the Mahatma 
Letters came from, and how they where created, the above is part of it 
( I repeat myself with this of course) so those who want to claim 
explanations that defy all rules of physics and logic as we know them to 
date (2002) should provide some reasonable evidence to proof 
otherwise.

For example where are other documents independent of Blavatsky 
about this (apparently organized) Brotherhood in Tibet, Egypt, and other 
places ? 

Besides having largely been produced as per above (Bailey/Smith/ and 
the hundreds of other such examples that exist all over the place if you 
just study the subject) it has been clearly shown that The Mahatma 
Letters (again this seems to meet the pattern of Blavatsky see: ) also 
contain directs copying from texts Blavatsky (or/and whoever helped her 
at times) cuold clearly have in here (there if Damodar was involved) ) 
position, like the (by now famous) "Kiddle incident" the copying from 
American occultist P.B.Randolph's books and so on. Ad to this all the 
evidence listed in the book by the Hare brothers already back in 
1936 "Who Wrote The Mahatma Letters ?" that NOT ALL, has been 
refuted by Theosophists EVER, and added to this what we know today 
(read the books of Johnson/Godwinn/Deveney) the case can be said to 
be clear enough and closed. Blavatsky as is abundantly shown in 
Johnson/Godwinn/Deveney clearly mined other people and sources, and 
synthesized them.

And the "elder Brothers" where not the older races, because they had to 
go! But the elder brothers where the members of the Brotherhood that 
had looked upon man since its conception. And they came from the 
Aryan home land Atlantis carried ,there Atlantean palm leaf library up to 
Tibet where they setled dow. But they where not Tibetans themselves 
because they said Tibetans to be semblances of humanity that with all 
the rest had to disappear.

So the from there Aryan abode in Tibet they wrote the Mahatma letters 
gave Blavatsky the Stanzas from Atlantis, and directed the writing of the 
commentary of this Atlantian document they had carried up there and 
make sure the Secret Doctrine with the teachings of the "elder" Aryan 
brothers from Atlantis. 

Brian







[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application