Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00738)

Belonging to the same missionary group as Wry, you seem to be more 
intelligent and have a sense of humor. So lets make a deal , you the 
smart one stays, Wry goes, oke ?
Brian
--- In theos-talk@y..., "netemara888" <netemara888@y...> wrote:
> Brian writes or posts: "Irrespective of whether this was interpreted 
> in Identity terms as the prophesied global reign of the anti-Christ, 
> or understood in more secular terms, the conclusion that white 
> Americans were to be subjugated was clear. Federal violence, 
> symbolized by the 1992 killing at Ruby Ridge and the burning flames 
> of Waco in 1993 left no doubt in believers' minds about what should 
> be expected."
> 
> Comment: I was watching a Christian broadcast and on it there was a 
> Jewish author who had just published, had book published, in which 
he 
> provides evidence, hard evidence, that Prince Charles of England is 
> the anti-christ. He says that Charles can or does trace himself back 
> to King David. And you say that there is a bridge between the Jews of 
> England and the British that would almost make it sound like those 
> Brits who were sent here on the Mayflower or the pilgrims were 
mostly 
> Jews! And that would make of most Americans not only part Native 
> American, which runs through most of the population in the Americas, 
> but also part Jewish. 
> 
> I know Bailey said that Jews are basically found everywhere, but is 
> that what you are implying here? As well as predicting the fall of 
> the Aryan man? The US is the only country in the world that has not 
> declared its majority's language as the official language i.e. 
> English. Or have I missed that somewhere, has this ever been 
declared 
> and put in writing that English is this country's official language. 
> If not then Spanish could very well be declared the official language 
> of America, and soon.
> 
> Finally Brian: If even 1/10th of what you posted has any basis in 
> truth, then it would seem that race would have to be an invention of 
> Satan, and not from God. Because it is here not to restore our faith 
> in the human race, but to destroy it by being blinded by it. Did God 
> intend us to be blinded by color? MLK said that we would become a 
> color blind society and that men would be judged by the content of 
> their character, and NOT the color of their skin. And that implies 
> that one has to have some damn character in the first place before 
> being judged. But being a Christian preacher he is still using words 
> like judgement and character and the like. So, even in his high-road 
> approach of what is to come he is still using words which indicate 
> that someone has to EARN their way into being loved, accepted, 
> wanted, and most of all SEEN. Not be the invisible man on the block.
> 
> Is MLK telling his own people they better straighten up or else? They 
> as well as others need some character to call their own in order to 
> be a part of the 'new order?' and in order to be acceptable and loved 
> as well. I don't see it the way MLK sees it, and I don't really 
> think 'God' sees it that way either. Energy is impersonal, what we do 
> with it makes us in the eyes of men -- angels or devils--white or 
> black, good or evil. These are the meanings we as a culture have 
> attributed to white: good, angelic...etc. So where do you suggest we 
> start Brian?
> 
> We are really all Latinos at heart. I know I am part Cuban.
> 
> Netemara