Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00797)

University of Vienna that is obviously where my sever is as you pointed 
out by yourself.msome people have as server yahoo yet might live in 
africa or in Asia not the US were the yahoo server is, you know that 
verry well as you reun more then one website yourself.
Do you live in the actual place where your server is ??? Millions of 
people worldwide don't !

In any case this is well known yet you kept insisting I am a female in 
spite of the fact the I am not Brigitte Muehlegger. So I must considdder 
you a very very strange queer if nor worse then that. 

As for strange people like you testifying to protect the childmolesting 
behaviour just to get another queernes example in the stile you are 
adamant of. 

Do place the records of the courtprocedure where people of youir 
above misjudgement caliber where defending the molestating behaviour 
of Charles Leadbeater in court. Place the proceedings on line if you are 
honest and qwe can all discuss them.

There are other patterns fitting into your behaviour. George Arundale, 
for example, defended Leadbeater child molestation charges on the 
grounds that "the extraordinary purity of his own life enables him to 
handle, as no other teacher, as no other individual, would dare to 
handle, problems of vital moment to the growing youth."( General 
Report of the Forty-seventh Anniversary and Convention of the TS 1922, 
Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House 1923,p.13.)

Besant herself argued regarding the child molestation charges brought 
against Leadbeater in court, that occult morality "cares for realities not 
conventions" and concluded, "I speak on this as an Occultist. 'He that is 
able to receive it [this teaching], let him receive it."( "A Letter to the 
Members of the Theosophical Society," November 1908, 5-6,111/46F, 
TSE.)

Theosophical Society members continually invoked his authority as an 
eminent occultist in defending his actions. For example, William Glenny 
Keagey's "General Memorandum" on the subject pronounced 
Leadbeater's "qualifications for expressing an authoritative opinion on 
the subject to be exceptional." (W G. Keagey, "General Memorandum on 
the Recent Attack against Mr. Leadbeater," 21 November 1906, 2, 6-7, 
111/ 46M, TSE.)

There are other testimonies made especially during the various court 
hearings of the child molestation charges. I just received photocopies of 
all of them, but it is a 56cm high pile, so it will take me a few days to 
work through all of them. Tomorrow I will start by placing following 
article plus any reactions to it. And I hope to place a Leadbeater 
courtcase article within 3 days, at which time I will move on to other 
subjects on "Esoteric and Pseudo-Science News."

A book is being written about this rediquolous behaviour of theosophists 
in Dezember this year.

Maybe you will learn from that to behave as litter more cultivated : 

http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~muehleb9


--- In theos-talk@y..., "Daniel H. Caldwell" <comments@b...> wrote:
> Dear Brian Muehlbach, 
> 
> You wrote:
> 
> "I consider it a pervert quereness of (mentally disturbed ?) Daniel 
> C. Caldwell for accusing me, who has fathered two children of 
> being 'female.' In fact my picture is on my website for eveybody to 
> see. In fact I never in my live lived in 'Austria' as Danield C. 
> Caldwell also claims on this list."
> 
> Brian, you say you have never "lived" in Austria, yet you signed two 
> of your emails posted on "IndianCivilization" as follows:
> 
> Brian Muehlbach (University of Vienna)
> 
> Quoted from:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IndianCivilization/message/28578
> 
> Brian Muehlbach (University of Vienna)
> 
> Quoted from:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IndianCivilization/message/28581
> 
> It would appear that you are SOMEHOW RELATED to the University of 
> Vienna (Austria). If not, why did you sign these two emails in that 
> fashion?
> 
> When you sign emails with "Brian Muehlbach (University of Vienna)", 
> it must mean something, right?
> 
> More could be said on this, but I will move on.
> 
> Brian, there are ALSO other subscribers on this list under the 
> impression that you are Brigitte Muehlegger.
> 
> For example, Bill Meredith wrote on Theos-Talk:
> 
> "I think most of us know that Brian and Brigitte are the same soul. 
> The truth is that she acknowledged this several months ago on 
another 
> list [WET]." 
> 
> Quoted from:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/7947
> 
> Brian, do you declare as FALSE Bill's statement that "she [Brigitte] 
> acknowledged this [that Brian and Brigitte are the same soul] several 
> months ago on another list [WesternEsotericTraditions]"?
> 
> Even Paul Johnson recently wrote that:
> 
> ". . . it's apparent to everyone else that they [Brian & Brigitte] 
> manage the same website, ergo..." Yes, "ergo" indeed.
> 
> Brigitte was the webmaster of the site that you are NOW the 
webmaster.
> 
> Furthermore, consider your email address listed on your web site:
> 
> news@ brian-muehlbach.com
> 
> The domain brian-muehlbach.com is apparently registered to Brigitte 
> Muehlegger. See http://www.netsol.com/cgi-bin/whois/whois
> 
> If you look up the WHOIS record on that site you find the following 
> info (I give only the first eleven lines of info):
> 
> Domain Name.......... brian-muehlbach.com
> Creation Date........ 2002-08-10
> Registration Date.... 2002-08-10
> Expiry Date.......... 2003-08-10
> Organisation Name.... Brigitte Muehlegger
> Organisation Address. Auhofstrasse 168/12
> Organisation Address. 
> Organisation Address. Vienna
> Organisation Address. 1130
> Organisation Address. A
> Organisation Address. AUSTRIA
> 
> If you are not Brigitte, then it is fairly obvious [from a historical 
> research perspective if not from a commonsense point of view] that 
> you know and "work" with Brigitte in some capacity. Do you deny that 
> you know Brigitte Muehlegger?
> 
> Also Brian, remember that even you wrote not too long ago:
> 
> "Fact is my name is Brian, but never mind on-line you can call me 
> anything you want, John or Max, or Brenda or Fritz or Joanne, 
> whatever."
> 
> Therefore, if some of us choose to still call you Brigitte, then 
> don't we have YOUR BLESSINGS to do just that because you 
> wrote "...never mind on-line you can call me ANYTHING YOU 
WANT..."? 
> caps added.
> 
> Enough said on this subject.
> 
> Daniel