Theos-Talk Archives (December 2002 Message tt00141)

--- In theos-talk@y..., leonmaurer@a... wrote:
> Are you now implying that what ticked you off was that I was 
castigating 
> Daniel? You must be Joking. Daniel has been the only one here who 
> consistently was questioning the credibility and truthfulness of 
the one that 
> I pointed out was viciously attacking theosophy, HPB and the 
Masters. In 
> fact, Daniel and I have never had any disagreements, and I admire 
the work he 
> has done and is doing for theosophy. 
> 
> Maybe you should reread the letter that triggered your crude 
remarks and 
> comment about my being "vicious" -- as well as read the dialogues 
that Daniel 
> and I had with Brian/Bridgitte over the past couple of years -- 
that got 
> him/her banned from this site twice.
> 
> As for your posts, I have no complaint with them and even enjoy 
reading them 
> when they make theosophical sense. However, I don't appreciate 
your "being 
> in our face" with crude remarks based on loose cannon judgments 
about why and 
> who I might be "pointing a finger" at. In any event, I don't think 
this 
> "pointing of a finger" at your thoughtless remarks is too far out 
of line 
> with reality. :-)
> 
> LHM
> 


*************

Okay LHM so you're a know-it-all Theosophist...Maybe it was Bart's 
posts. Hell, if I am going to reread all those posts again :( 

You think you're responses are perfect but sometimes I had a problem 
discerning what you wrote from the other author. I read a bunch of 
your posts and while they are erudite sounding--it was problemic 
figuring out who was answering what. So that is in my defense. As for 
you---->>know-it-alls need no defending, they are self-sufficient :\ 

Netemara

So it seems YOU owe me an apology for having to go on a truth hunt 
through your awful posts---just kidding. They weren't bad, not bad at 
all.





> 
> 
> In a message dated 11/30/02 10:55:06 PM, netemara888@y... writes:
> 
> >You need not answer my question. But you have no problem 
castigating 
> >Daniel Caldwell do you? He has helped keep Theosophy alive by his 
> >research and work on The Blavatsky Archives. And you seem to be 
here 
> >to tear him and his work down. I for one do not appreciate your 
> >efforts along those lines. You need not prove to me you're vicious.
> >
> >Netemara
> >
> >As for not being in your face, don't read my posts. Besides you 
are 
> >not the owner of this forum and have no business talking about who 
> >should be excluded from it.