Theos-Talk Archives (March 2003 Message tt00298)

Hi Mic and all you,

I agree a lot on the below.
I think you are getting to the core of the problems.

Try this view:
So when do the Star Trek Federation become a reality ?
When does USA realise, what a Farengi really is ?
(Funny enough. In the olden days some sufis called the western area for
Farangistan.)
And when does some Middle Eastern leaders recognize, what a Klingon is ?
When does The United Nations change, so that
the permanent members The United Nations Security Counsil - NO more can say
:
"We are all equal, but some are more equal than others", -
i.e. the permanent members of The United Nations Security Counsil have more
influence on peace than other countries has.

The Voyager is orbiting the Earth.
Well, I am ready to open up for all the Hailing Frequencies, but are the
leaders on this Planet ready ?
When will the leaders on this Planet stop acting like animals ?

Let the nations on this Planet face it: We all have to stick togehter.

Well, this was some views.
Feel free to do your best...

from
M. Sufilight with peace and love...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mic Forster" <micforster@yahoo.com>
To: <Blavatskiana@yahoogroups.com>; <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: Theos-World Re: The issue before us


>
> --- rodakjl <rodakjl@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> The focus seems to
> > be solely on what the
> > current American policy is perceived as and the
> > demonization of George W.
> > because he is trying, in his own way, to do what his
> > conscience dictates to
> > relieve the pain and suffering of the Iraqi
> > citizenry.
>
>
> But that IS exactly the issue before us. No one is
> disagreeing that Saddam is evil and needs to be
> ousted; it is the means of ousting that is causing
> world-wide concern. Why:
>
> i) if the US does go to war unilaterally then it opens
> itself to unprecedented terrorism. Going to war will
> merely fuel the flames of extremists;
>
> ii) the Iraqi army is a spent force and poses
> absolutely no direct threat to US security. If the
> argument is that Saddam has WMD and he will be willing
> to give these to terrorists, and he is in contact with
> such terrorists, then why don't these terrorists have
> these weapons already?
>
> iii) if the US goes to war without UN backing, what
> will the US do if China (as a hypothetical) decides to
> claim back Taiwan?
>
> iv) the US is the only super power left on this
> planet. In the past its power was checked by the USSR.
> Who, in the future, will be willing, or even have the
> capability, to stop any other US military action? Some
> may say China which then begs the question: would you
> rather deal with the UN or a China that has finally
> attained a position of world-wide power? And don't
> laugh because China is quickly catching up to the
> US......
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>