Theos-Talk Archives (July 2003 Message tt00251)

LHM wrote:

<<For those interested in seeing how close modern 
science is getting to confirming (as HPB predicted) the 
metaphysics of Theosophical Cosmogenesis (as 
geometrically and symbolically formulated in the Book 
of Dzyan and explained in the Secret Doctrine) -- that 
implies an infinite fractal series of involved fields 
within fields within fields, of descending orders of both 
energy and frequency emanating from the primal zero 
(laya) point-instant of infinite abstract motion or 
"spinergy"... >.

If "fields within fields" is implicitly offered as having 
anything "Higher" and "More" than some form of 
interpretive, karmic/mayavic, dualistic/multiplistic 
relevance (ie, no matter how "accurate" that stated or 
implicit offering might appear to be within such 
interpretive guidelines) then I would question such 
offerings (in a sense): feeling that what is really going 
on (or "Really Going On") transcends such "essentially 
simplistic" worldview structuring. Still, if "fields 
within fields," and the like, is seen as "useful 
modeling" or if seen as "helpful on the path," say, then, 
(obviously?) there would seem to be some 
"usefullness" (ie, in whatever sense, as in "the study of 
Theosophy") in such modeling, so ... That is, if karmic 
tendencies are karmic tendencies ...

Having said all that (and if the reader is still there ...) I 
wonder if one might also extend what might be a 
somewhat too one-sided approach re a too-simplistic
view of "Higher Reality" via any science that would 
confine, or tend to confine, that "Higher" into any 
kind of "too simplistic" causefulness or logicality ... (ie, 
seeing as HPB seems to have referred to such as 
"Beness" and "Higher" and "enlightenment" as being 
beyond the kind of causes and logic that transcend our 
"ordinary realistics" and "ordinary," or "essentially 
dualistic," sciences). Not that ...

Speculatively,
Mauri