Theos-Talk Archives (July 2003 Message tt00308)

Mauri, 
Since you mentioned (one of :-) my names, I feel I should try to respond. 
But, even if I understood what your questions or speculations referred to, I 
couldn't comment on them coherently since I am not familiar with the new language 
you are using to state them. Please explain your last sentence in plain 
English, and quote the letter you are responding to (no need to attribute the 
author). Also quote the "per Leon" statements you are referring to. It would 
also be helpful if you could furnish definitions or (in context) references for 
all words placed in quotes or separated by slashes. Thanks.

Leon

In a message dated 07/29/03 9:39:33 PM, mhart@idirect.ca writes:

>Somebody wrote: <<>> 
>
>I wonder if "lower" and "higher" might, alternately, (or 
>"Alternately," from a "Higher" perspective) be seen as somewhat 
>equally mayavic, (ie, as essentially mayavic as the 
>dualistic/multiplistic "free will" of "ordinary reality"), along with 
>a conditioned or worldview-related "contrast" 
>("interpretive"/karmic variant) that might be theoretically known 
>as "unfree will" (?)... so that a "r/Realer " question about "higher 
>free will" (if such a question might evolve from whatever 
>essentially speculative/"intuitive," modelistic, or Theosophic 
>sources?) might concern the transcendence of such essentially 
>dualistic/karmic dream-reality, (if "dualistic" with 
>interpretive/multiplistic variables, as per Leon), as by was of, eg, 
>whatever apparent bridging effects, models, interpretive/karmic 
>tendencies such as Theosophy ... ?
>
>Speculatively,
>Mauri