Theos-Talk Archives (October 2003 Message tt00080)

Leon, you wrote:

"This whole discussion does nothing but obscure the 
teachings of fundamental theosophy, still sounds 
like a vendetta against ULT and WQJ by certain 
disgruntled 'organizationalists'. . . "

I replied:

"Please be more specific, WHO are the 
disgruntled 'organizationalists'?? Do you 
refer to me? To Tony? To Peter?"

Leon, you then replied in turn:

"No offense intended. If the shoe fits, wear it. 
If not, forget it. :-)"

Leon, I have looked up the terms in the dictionary
but it is NOT clear to me why you felt the need
to bring up the phrase "certain 
disgruntled 'organizationalists'. . . " or exactly
what it means.

You even put in quotation marks the word: 
organizationalists. You must have had
some idea in your mind especially to add
the word "disgruntled". 

If you really believe Peter, Tony and I are
"disgruntled 'organizationalists'" then don't
be shy, call a spade a spade if that is the case.

All I ask is that you explain exactly
what you mean by this phrase. I can't read
your mind.

As written without further explanation, the
phrase reads like an "ad hominem" remark possibly
thrown out by you to distract attention from the issue
being discussed.

Daniel