theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

re different interpretations of SD

Nov 19, 2003 04:33 PM
by Mauri


Gerald wrote (to Dallas, on Theosophy Study List): <<I just want to show that we can read the SD and come away with different interpretations.>>

That brings to mind an article I read today in the Nov/Dec 2003 issue of "Phenomena" magazine contributed by Whitley Strieber. Some quotes from that article:

<<There are two reasons why our visi­tors cannot save us now. The first is that we are very limited in our ability even to see them, and thus they cannot, as things are now constituted, express themselves into our minds and our world fully enough to communicate with us in a reli­able and consistent manner. Those who are trying to prevent this know this, and are engaging in a subtle and brillian holding action on behalf of the status quo. They believe that they are fighting for our 'way of life' and our free­dom. What they are actually fighting for is the death of mankind, because unless we can find a way to see our situation more clearly, we are going to ignore the environmental warning signs until it's too late. As we have perhaps less than ten years left before the situation becomes irreversible, it's obvious that the 'crisis of contact' must come soon.>>

The words <<perhaps less than ten years left before the situation becomes irreversible>> seem interesting to me in that just yesterday I watched a Nova program about, among other things, a computer model (of phycisist Gary Stretmeir, or something like that) who talked about what he referred to as his "proof," unless I'm mistaken, that the next flip of earth's magnetic poles is overdue. And, in a separate article in the same issue of Phenomena I read that apparently there will be:

<< ... a culminating event on Dec 22, 2012>> that will, apparently,<<affect all earth like. That is also the date which ends the Mayan grand calendar.>>

Another quote from Strieber that I thought represented an interpretive parallel with Theosophy:

<<By 'conscious,' I do not mean the state of awareness that human beings presently experience. This is not con­sciousness. It is only perception. Con­sciousness is a much larger state. It is fully potentiated outside of space-time. Such minds see everything, from the beginning to the end of time, all at once. This awful seeing is what all of those who seek to deny the inexorable emergence of consciousness fear. It is why, for example, that denial is so strident, and why being face to face with conscious entities is so very frighten­ing. To face such an awareness, whether it is in oneself or in another, feels to the mind as if it is in danger of annihilation. This is because the world is assembled by such a mind in a vastly more accurate and therefore more potent manner than a mind diminished by immersion in space-time can ever achieve. It is why it is so difficult for us to dif­ferentiate between 'good' and 'evil' enti­ties. The presence that we face is always pressing us in the direction of entropy. It must, because unless we are strong enough to resist this pressure, any joining of us to its own state is just an illusion.>>

Speculatively,
Mauri









[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application