theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

re anomolies, Theosophy, "visitors" ...

Nov 22, 2003 01:44 PM
by Mauri


John, your latest post about UFO/visitor topics seems to be basically compatible with my speculations, apparently, unless I'm not taking something into account that I couldn't figure out, overlooked, or ... I might read your post again and maybe find something else in it.

Here's some speculation, next, that I have trouble wording "sensibly enough."

What if one had to go from a to g, and what if one's route/means of getting between those two points were by way of a to b to c to d to e to f to g (ie, at least in terms of one's anticipated route in terms of one's current/apparent worldview); but what if one's definition of one's "accustomed route" were found to be (at some point) essential subservient to what might be called "karma," say, (as from a "Higher" perspective?) and what if there were, say, a "Higher" perspective that were found to transcend one's memory of one's accustomed route and worldview ("transcend" as per whatever "karmic effect," say ...); so that, while one might "verifiably" (ie, by way of whatever "accustomed worldview/logic") "appear" to be taking one's route as by way of a "logical enough/reassuring" path of a,b,c,d,e,f,g, what if the definition of "accustomed worldview" were, in essence, not edged in stone at all, but wholly plastic, in keeping with whatever "karmic dimensions" there might be that might, per whatever "karmic effects," affect one's "realer" path (that might be visible only from a "Higher" perspective?)... so that, in other words, what if one's definition of any particular route, perception, definition, worldview, Theosophy, speculation, etc, etc, were, in "reality," far more i/Immediate in terms of "karmic effects" than might be "customarily apparent" per whatever "lower" ("ordinary/customary") worldview ...

In other words, I'm wondering if one's path from a to g might only "appear" to be "logical" because of one's "accustomed worldview," but what if there were a broader perspective, or "Higher" perstpective, say, that were to show that, in essence, all of one's paths, thoughts, activities are essentially plastic in terms of not being slaves to anything but "newer-and-newer" or "current karma" in the sense that "memories" of "logical" and "accustomed" paths might be discovered to be no more than "logical results" of whatever worldview one is ('individually/collectively') "currently subscribing to" (in terms of being "karmic with," as it were); so that, while one's "logical" routes may be "remembered" well enough, what if such memories were discovered to be no more than essentially plastic, highly current "sense makings" (per whatever individual/collective "worldview" that might SEEM "stable enough, generally speaking") rather than representative of anything "Realer" from a "Higher" perspective: meaning (in "what if" terms) that, in effect, while one might be thinking in terms going by way of: a,b,c,d,e,f,g, one's Broader perspective might, instead, eg, show that one might be "really" going by way of, eg: c,d,a,e,f b,g, or whatever route that may "apprear to be logical" to, in effect, one's "lower" perspective ...

Of course I don't know if any of that made any kind of "sense" to anybody from any kind of perspective. Sorry about the confusing, redundant, etc, wording. Anyway, I think I was trying to "make sense" out of "apparent anomolies." But of if one's anomolies insist on being anomolies, well ... ^:-/ ...

Speculatively,
Mauri





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application