theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

re Theosophy, anomalies, part 3

Nov 23, 2003 01:23 PM
by Mauri


<<Mauri, Thanks for your response, as always. I need to clarify to you my use of the term "Gnomon," I use the word in the sense of a Sundial that has a central Pylon vertical at the center and as a result casts a shadow caused by the Suns light, the shadow is cast and moves on the Dial surface and "indicates" the time of day. I am not intending any other form such as "Gnosis" or a person's knowledge or deficiency of knowledge. I only used the term as a tool meaning "Indicator" which distinguishes between Light and Darkness, Primary and Secondary, Original Nature and Corporeal Carnate Nature as a Metaphor. >>

Me too, basically, in a sense, I think ...

<<But, I do agree that we are all Gnomons or indicators as we are all at
this level unique differentiation's and human beings , "Seekers" if you will, or we
would not be on this list.>>

Me to basically, in a sense, I think ...

<<The True and the Secondary are not a representation or assessment of any one in particular, but are only referencing a Metaphysical Reality on the scale of magnitude of the Creation in which we find our common participation as per Dallas's post today on the Globes and Rounds. Like I said, Karma has a Habitation, which means a definite locality of manifestation. It can only have activity or process when a Creation is in manifestation and that is what I call the Secondary.>>

Okay, me too, that about "True and Secondary," but I think I also had in mind (what might be seen as ...) an "extension, or sorts" (well, speculatively speaking, hence the quotes) of such a definition in some "more individual sense" that, at the same time, might be seen, (by some?), to serve double duty, in a sense, to an extent, in whatever "Broader context," say ... Not that we might not all have our own various definitions for "True and Secondary" in whatever sense, context.

<<The premise is that the Absolute
is Absolute by definition and remains unchanged and unmarked and not beholden to
Karma. Our Original Nature which is in the Absolute is unmarked and unstained and
in terms of the Absolute and Unity has never moved and never departed. So
on the scale of magnitude of our individuality here we are two realities, one awake in the Light, the other asleep in the Darkness as the Gnostic would say. So there is neither departing or arriving and "Lila" is the word used in India to communicate this overall condition or process and translates as "sport" referencing Vishnu as Creator that
in his sleep dreams the Universes. This only is a metaphor to indicate the
Mayavic reality when creation (the secondary) is referenced to the Primary, the Absolute. John >>>

For whatever reason, I seem to find myself basically agreeing with you, in a sense, to some extent, apparently ... Why? Hmm ... I don't seem to "know enough about that," exactly. On the other hand, if "agreeing" is basically just as "karmic/mayavic" as "disagreeing"... ^:-/ Not that ...

Speculatively,
Mauri








[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application