Theos-Talk Archives (December 2003 Message tt00006)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "christinaleestemaker" 
<christinaleestemaker@y...> wrote:
> To Netamara, used the 888 in the wrong way!
> 
> You are realy missing the way.
> If the theosofist becomes to the buddhish areas then they are 
> completely on the intuitive level.
> 
> The Sikhs are not they the murderers of Ghandi, the very old 
Indian 
> wise man and if such a noble man must die by murdering the group 
have 
> had done that is the black side of life, also that is the way you 
> choose then.
> 
> Be attended, Christina
> 

You lost me Christina, I am not understanding your point here.

Namaste

Netemara
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "netemara888" 
<netemara888@y...> 
> wrote:
> > by both Blavatsky and Olcott? I find "Old Diary Leaves" ODL to 
be a 
> > golden source of history and one which is accessible to 
everyone. I 
> > find it interesting in their love of comparative religions 
(which 
> > they lived and not just talked about) to be one which should 
have 
> > all of us scratching our heads. I mean they both took pansil--or 
> > were initiated as Buddhists and then fell in love with the Sikhs 
> and 
> > the ceremonies of the Golden Temple! I am not sure off the top 
of 
> my 
> > head if they were initiated into Sikhism, since they were not 
> > Indian, not sure if that was possible back then, but isn't it 
> > strange, not to me as I attended the Congress on World 
Religions, 
> > held in Chicago which only comes around every 100 years, that 
they 
> > went around in and out of religions like it was no big deal? 
> > 
> > This is one of my favorite stories about the chums, and it 
saddens 
> > me that no one really talks about Olcott and his role in the TS. 
> > However, Judge is no less an important character.
> > 
> > On Radhasoami studies they are having a big discussion about the 
> > role of Salig Ram in shaping Radhasoami. Well, it seems that the 
> > later masters left out one little detail that SR had made clear: 
> > That everyone could initiate, not just the select line of chosen 
> > masters. That would be the same as saying that anyone could be a 
> > priest or perform the same rites as a priest as long as they 
were 
> > catholic and had observed the religion for a set period of time. 
> > 
> > What does that have to do with the TS today? Well, according to 
> > Alice Bailey, the TS as a spiritual organ is now defunct, dead, 
> > over. And if you go to TS meetings around the country, you will 
> find 
> > that it has an aura much like the moon, something is missing, 
and 
> > it's not just Netemara who finds this. Sure there are some 
meetings 
> > which may have a good number of people and meetings, but as an 
> > evolutionary role and spiritual organ the bataan (sp) or Dharma 
has 
> > been passed on to its successor.
> > 
> > Netemara