Re: You can't deny what never happened - There is no denialism because the Holocaust never happened
Jan 07, 2004 03:28 AM
by christinaleestemaker
Zonpower from Cyberspace
Chapter 18
What is the Illuminati?
What is Zon?
The Illuminati has its origins in the biblical Abraham who smashed
the idols four millennia ago in establishing the existence of only
one reality.
Ever hear of the Illuminati? For the past two centuries, they have
been condemned by nationalistic governments and mystical religions.
How about the Bilderbergers, the Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Trilateral Commission? They are semi-secret
organizations that for the past several decades have been linked to
one-world conspiracy theories. Consider the controlling influences
behind those worldwide organizations -- businessmen, such as today's
quiet businessman David Rockefeller. He, for example, is seldom seen
or mentioned in the mainstream media. But, he is hysterically
attacked as the epitome of evil by the ultra-conservative media, the
nationalistic-populist media, and the religious-right media. Yet,
David Rockefeller is among the world's most moral, clear-thinking,
responsible people.
The Illuminati Protocols
This chapter refers to the early Illuminati protocols -- the master
plan for worldwide control first formulated over two centuries ago by
leading European bankers and businessmen. Essentially anyone reading
the protocols alone and out of context would view them as one of the
most evil plots ever devised. Yet, on reading those very same
protocols in the context of wide-scope accountability, one will
realize the men responsible for those protocols were among the most
moral, clear-thinking, responsible people who ever lived on this
planet. Moreover, through Zon, today's Illuminati can make everyone
on Earth rich and happy.
Making the Illuminati Serve You
Zon will far surpass the goal of the Illuminati. By understanding
Zon, the Illuminati and their organizations will be at your service --
providing you with limitless wealth.
Business-Controlled Master Plans
Business-controlled master plans underlie all actions controlling the
creation of long-term prosperity and happiness. Two such master plans
or protocols operate on planet Earth: (1) the closed-system
Illuminati protocols developed in Europe over two centuries ago, and
(2) the evolving, open-ended Zon protocols that began developing in
early 1992 and reflected in the American elections of 1994. Today,
Zon is replacing the Illuminati's master plan. With Zon, the world
will soar in cyberspace beyond the Illuminati's plan for worldwide
prosperity. For, Zon delivers eternal happiness with limitless wealth
to all conscious beings.
The Illuminati, from its founding protocols forged in the mid-18th
century by Adam Weishaupt and Albert Pike, have nearly completed
their noble goal of undermining and eliminating the twin instruments
of irrationality and destruction on this planet: (1) forced-backed
nationalist governments, and (2) fraud-backed mystical religions.
Now, after two centuries, that goal will not only be achieved but far
surpassed, perhaps as early as 2001AD. How? By replacing the
established, seemingly violent Illuminati protocols with the newly
evolving, peaceful Zon protocols as deduced from the original, 176-
page Cassandra's Secret manuscript developed in 1993. The specific
Zon protocols will be ready for public use before 2001AD. But, first,
one must understand the goal and protocols of the original Illuminati
as described below:
The Illuminati's Business Plan for Depoliticizing Planet Earth
Since the late 1700s, essentially all public reporting and exposés of
the secretive Illuminati have been rabidly negative. Most such
reports and exposés emanate from paranoid conspiracy theories
presented in populist, nationalistic, or right-wing religious
publications. All such reports and exposés present the Illuminati and
their protocols as diabolically evil. Modern-day exposés especially
rail at the Illuminati's tools used to undermine public respect for
political-agenda laws, irrational traditions, and predatory
institutions. The Illuminati work to undermine public support of the
parasitical-elite class...a destructive class that survives through
politically and religiously ruled governments.
The modern-day tools of the Illuminati include international
organizations such as the Trilateral Commission, the Council on
Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, the Club of Rome, and the
outdated Freemasons. In addition to high-profile parasitical elites,
those organizations comprise the most-influential, low-profile
businesspeople throughout the world. Still, they are all simply tools
masterfully maneuvered into advancing the Illuminati's goal.
Many members of those organizations are sincere value producers;
others are power-seeking parasites. Yet, all effectively serve the
Illuminati's pretended goal of worldwide political and economic
cooperation. Beneath that goal, however, lies the Illuminati's real
goal: break the institutions that support this destructive
anticivilization.
To understand the Illuminati, one must understand their poker-playing
modus operandi. The Illuminati perfected the shrewdest poker-playing
stratagems imaginable -- analogous to those stratagems revealed in
Frank R. Wallace's Advanced Concepts of Poker, first published in
1968. After 21 printings, plus additional printings by Crown
Publishing and Warner Books, Wallace withdrew that book from print in
1986 in favor of the evolving Neo-Tech literature.
Consider the following stratagem by the Illuminati: To most
effectively achieve their goal, they knew their real targets for
termination must remain concealed for as long as possible. Because of
their world-wide influences, the Illuminati also realized that, over
time, information about their work and goal would leak to the public,
despite their influence over the world news media. Thus, the
Illuminati planted ruses in their protocols that would invite
hysterical criticism of them and their satellite organizations. By
promoting hysteria against themselves, criticisms would lose
credibility, preventing any effective effort to block or retard their
progress.
For example, the Illuminati realized their secret protocols would
eventually be publicly revealed. Thus, they drafted their Protocols
to conceal their real agenda. They made their Protocols to appear as
a Jewish or Zionist plot for placing all human beings under one-world
tyrannical rule. They floated a poker-ploy hoax document titled The
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Throughout that document,
they shrewdly planted a Jewish slur word for Gentiles to describe
their targets -- the goyim.
That strategy has worked brilliantly for two centuries: All exposés
or attacks on the Illuminati turn into strident accusations about
being evil socialistic, communistic, Jewish, Zionist, satanic, or
Luciferin plots for world domination. Thus, all exposés and attacks
have ultimately been dismissed as paranoid anti-Semitic, Jew baiting,
racist, or religious-right paranoia -- exactly what the Illuminati
intended.[ 67 ] ...Incidentally, from their origin to modern day,
many among the Illuminati are Jewish. But, they are moral Jewish
businessmen, not socialists or Zionists seeking world domination.
Indeed, the Illuminati are ingenious "poker players" who orchestrate
criticisms of them to advance their goal.
The Illuminati especially utilize their poker strategies in wielding
influence from their toolbox of international organizations. Those
organizations comprise the world's leading businesspeople,
politicians, journalists, publishers, bankers, industrialists,
military leaders, and other influential people used to advance a one-
world agenda. But, that agenda conceals the real goal fully known
only to the Illuminati. That goal is to undermine and eliminate the
institutions supporting parasitical elites.
What gave the Illuminati businessmen their overwhelming power and
success for the past two centuries? The answer lies in their ability
to create genuine values and jobs for society, combined with an
unshakable moral responsibility to bring growing prosperity to all
conscious beings on this planet. Their moral foundation, however, was
based on knowledge limited to this closed, irrational
anticivilization. Thus, for them, the only possible way to preserve
and then flourish human consciousness on Earth was to eliminate, by
whatever means necessary, the institutions that support this
anticivilization and its parasitical-elite propagators. ...But, means
cannot justify the ends -- morally...and ultimately, practically.
Zon, by contrast, functions through the consistently sound principle
of fully integrated honesty. Thus, Zon solves such dilemmas by
delivering practical, objectively moral solutions free of force and
violence.
Zon replaces the moral justification for violence upon which the
Illuminati have stood since their institution-breaking role in the
1793 French Revolution. ...Today, Zon has replaced that justification
with a moral foundation that peacefully elevates the wealth and
happiness of all conscious beings throughout time and existence. That
moral base stands on integrated honesty, productive effort, wide-
scope accounting, objective law, and the Golden-Helmet dynamics as
detailed in the Appendix at the end of this manuscript.
The institution-breaking accomplishments of the Illuminati along with
their one-world organizations such as the Bilderbergers and the
Trilateral Commission provide an advanced position from which the
Civilization of the Universe can envelop this planet while peacefully
vanishing the anticivilization and its manipulators.
With the discovery of Zon, the keys to prosperity are found in (1)
originating conscious actions from Civilization-of-the-Universe
perspectives and (2) recognizing that anticivilization perspectives
are unreal. In that way, harmful aspects of the anticivilization are
dismissed and ultimately vanished. Also, in that way, the two-century-
old Illuminati dynamics of using deceit and force to undermine those
elements supporting the anticivilization are replaced by the honest,
peaceful Zon dynamics.
The Most Moral Men on Earth
Without the concepts of white-hat neocheating and advanced poker
strategy combined with Neo-Tech, anyone who reads the Illuminati
protocols[ 68 ] will come to the same conclusion: Those protocols are
the epitome of evil. But on understanding neocheating and the
concepts of poker along with Neo-Tech and Cassandra's Secret, one
comes to the exact opposite conclusion: The Illuminati protocols
reflect the most responsible and moral forces on Earth -- forces
designed to bring wealth and happiness to our world by breaking the
institutions and racisms that support this parasitically drained,
death-oriented anticivilization.
As identified in the Neo-Tech Discovery, the original Illuminati also
realized that honest business dynamics are what sustain and advance
conscious life. Thus, those business dynamics are the only source of
genuine, life-enhancing power among conscious beings. Indeed, only
competitive value-and-job producers hold real power -- the ultimate
power to control not only current events but future events on planet
Earth.
Until the original 18th-century Illuminati, no value-and-job producer
understood the draining hoaxes and illusions of the parasitical
elites. From Plato's time, a ruling leech class has built and
propagated an anticivilization with the single purpose of sustaining
their own harmful livelihoods by draining the productive class.
The Illuminati discovered that they, not kings, popes, tyrants,
sultans, or other parasitical elites hold the power to control and
direct society. On that realization, those original Illuminati, most
of whom were powerful businessmen and bankers, moved with confidence
to eliminate the parasitical elites by relentlessly pitting those
leeches and their institutions against each other. That dynamic
caused the world populations to increasingly lose confidence in
politics, nationalistic governments, mystical religions, and their
parasitical leaders.
Schindler's List, the factual story of German businessman Oskar
Schindler in the 1940s, illustrates how even at the evilest depths of
this anticivilization, the value-and-job producer is the only person
with genuine power and love...even midst humanoids who live by guns
and mass murder. Only businessman Schindler, for example, could walk
through the bloody mud of the Holocaust without soiling his soul, his
compassion, his respect for human life. Only job-producing Schindler
had the power, moral character, and strength to reach into the depths
of this anticivilization to save conscious beings from the
destruction and death wrought by its humanoid propagators.
Extrapolate the metaphor of businessman Schindler into the advanced
technologies among the Civilization of the universe. One will then
recognize that honest businesspeople with their limitless valuation
of conscious beings are the real saviors of everyone in existence.
Only such value-and-job producers have the power, responsibility, and
love to never let perish the supreme value throughout the universe --
conscious life, including conscious human beings on planet
Earth. ...The competitive, value-and-job producing businessperson
eternally preserves and advances all conscious life.
The Illuminati originally comprised the few most efficacious
businessmen in Europe. The original Illuminati rejected parasites
holding false or life-draining power. Indeed, none of the Illuminati
were kings, tyrants, politicians, lawyers, religionists,
entertainers, writers, or orators. Instead, they were quiet
businessmen and bankers -- they were among the world's most potent
creators of life-sustaining values and jobs.
The Illuminati's relentless work has always been directed toward
saving the future generations of conscious beings from destruction by
the institutionalized irrationality woven throughout this
anticivilization. The Illuminati's goal has been to free conscious
beings from the tribal mentalities that make possible criminal
societies: parasitical governments, socialism, fascism, the welfare
state, and mystical religions.
The Illuminati sought a world in which its citizens valued their
fellow citizens not by social status, wealth, nationality, race, or
religion, but by what each did to competitively benefit others and
society.
For 250 years, playing the most ingenious poker game in history, the
Illuminati have brought much of the world close to their goal of
ending 3000 years of unnecessary suffering and death inflicted on all
populations of Earth -- inflicted by parasitical humanoids through
their criminal institutions. ...Finally, today, the newly arrived Zon
dynamics will not only peacefully achieve but far surpass the noble
goal of the Illuminati.
Chapter 35 publicly identifies the meaning beneath the Illuminati
protocols[ 69 ], their master plan, their one-world
organizations...and the resulting future for all on planet Earth
through Zon.[ 70 ]
The Neo-Tech Trojan Horse
Over the years, the Neo-Tech/Illuminati dynamic has evolved into
today's Zonpower. This 200-year-old dynamic is increasingly
undermining false, harmful authorities throughout governments and
religions worldwide. The Neo-Tech/Illuminati dynamic has been the
hidden force beneath the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and
America's coming sea change first reflected in its Neo-Tech inspired
1994 elections.
The seventh and final cyberspace stage of Neo-Tech/Zonpower -- the
public phase -- will activate sometime before 2001 with the Internet
distribution of the Zonpower Protocols...the Trojan-Horse penetration
of Neo-Tech into the heart of the Establishment in America and
worldwide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Footnotes for Chapter 18, What is the Illuminati? What is Zon?:
[ 67 ] A good example of how this strategy works is found in the
April, 1995, Reader's Digest article titled, "This Lie Will Not Die".
[ 68 ] The 18th-Century Illuminati Protocols, 32 pages, Zon
Association (1994).
[ 69 ] What is the source of those Protocols? In 1906, the British
Museum in London received a copy of the Illuminati Protocols written
in Russian. Those secret Protocols were probably translated into
Russian sometime after 1850 from the original German language
Protocols, which first appeared in Bavaria during the late 18th
century. Parts of the Protocols were used by Maurice Joly in his 1864
satire, Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. In the
early 20th century, British journalist Victor Marsden translated the
Protocols into English. His translations were finally issued by the
British Publishing Society in 1921 (Ref: Des Griffith, Fourth Reich
of the Rich). ...Metaphor or real, those Protocols express the
Illuminati strategy.
[ 70 ] The Illuminati's goal has always been to replace the
destructive forces of monarchism, nationalism, religion with the
productive dynamics of business. Toward that goal, Neo-Tech/Zonpower
adds (1) free-market dynamics for societal decisions plus (2) the
essentialness of working-class individuals. For, such working-class
individuals are disconnected from the elite class, which is
intellectually indoctrinated into closed-circle visions of nature.
Thus, non indoctrinated workers have retained their childhood
capacities for fully integrated honesty -- for wide-scope viewings of
nature. While vision-controlled elites, specialists, and
philosophers -- including most Objectivists -- have lost their
capacities for fully integrated honesty.
Indeed, the honest, wide-scope views of nature by the working class
will lead the mass advance of mankind into a rational civilization --
into the Civilization of the Universe. ... Such ability to see nature
as it is by non Establishment individuals -- an ability lost by the
indoctrinated elites -- was first identified by Georg Büchner (1813-
1837) in his path-breaking drama Woyzech.
Maybe this makes a more clear.
>From : http:www.nii.net/~obie/extensio.htm
If the text there is white on a light background you can chose on the
computer to select and put that in a readable colour.
This sites gives a lot over our history and you can visit aal from
the golden history book of Steven O Mar till the Bavarian illuminated
and so on. Somewhere I found something about Hitler that he use the
Swastika in the opposite way and that he uses the lessons of the
Rosecrusian and from his teaching in the Himalaya.
Have a nice look ,
Christina
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <ringding@b...>
wrote:
> Several Blavatsky students and truth seekers may be interested in
the following information:
>
> German lawyer Horst Mahler finds out: The Holocaust - that 6
million Jews were gassed in Germany - never happened.
> Several German public prosecutors proofed the case and did not find
any error.
>
> From the theosophic point of view this good news may be a also a
good starting point to have a deeper look on Hitler and start
research on him and his policy from the standpoint of the Ancient
Wisdom, but read for yourself the complete essay below:
>
>
> http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters/mahler4.htm
>
>
> From: "Horst Mahler" hm@d...
>
> To: "Adelaide Institute" info@a...
>
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:47 AM
>
>
> Subject: You can't deny what never happened -
>
> There is no denialism because the Holocaust never happened
>
>
>
> Please forward!!
>
> To whom it may concern.
>
> The uprising of the German People for the truth has begun. Its
course so far
> is described in attachment 01. It will be continued. The next step
of this
> course is to be the establishing of a "Society for the
Rehabilitation of
> Those persecuted for Denial of the Holocaust", for the purpose of
preparing,
> in organised form, the resumption of the proceedings against the
victims of
> punitive and disciplinary measures, and to support them, especially
> financially, in the execution of this.
>
> The judicial foundation for this course of action is simple: § 359
StPO
> [code of criminal procedure] provides the possibility for a
resumption of
> the proceedings in favour of a person who was legally convicted, in
case the
> evidential facts have changed. Even though the case that a
previously
> assumed obviousness of incriminating facts should no longer apply
is not
> considered in law, I am certain, that this gap can be bridged
through
> analogous deduction.
>
> The reason for resumption is given through the fact that, due to
the article
> of the main editor of the news magazine DER SPIEGEL, Fritjof Meyer,
the
> obviousness of the Holocaust is obviously no longer applicable.
Please see
> attachment 01 for details.
>
> In the constitutional complaint for Frank Rennicke, I explained how
the role
> of the judiciary is to be assessed. An excerpt of this is given as
> attachment 02.
>
> Are you prepared to join this society? The membership subscription
for the
> affected is Euros 3,--/month, for the non-affected Euros 10,--
/month.
> [Donations of any amount are welcome]. Registration of the society
and
> charitable benefit are not striven for. The standing rules will
meet the
> legal minimum requirements.
>
> Please direct your statement of purpose with details of your
complete name,
> date of birth and address (no PO boxes) to
>
> RA Horst Mahler, Weidenbusch 13, 14532 Kleinmachnow, Germany
>
> Tel.: 0049 33203 20460 Fax: 0049 33203 21059
>
> e-mail: hm@h...
>
> website: www.horst-mahler.de
>
>
> Kleinmachnow, the 29th of September 2003
>
> Horst Mahler
>
> If you would like to support our cause, please make your donation
payable
> to:
> Ursula Haverbeck-Wetzel, Sparkasse Herford, BLZ 494 501 20, account
no. 325
> 015 262 0.
>
>
>
> Attachment 01
>
> The "Campaign against the Obviousness of the Holocaust" has started
> successfully.
>
> We were forced to learn that the German Reich had provoked both
world wars,
> and that the National Socialists killed 6 million Jews - of which 4
million
> alone were killed in Auschwitz in gas chambers by Zyklon B. Whoever
> contested the figure that is connected to the latter form of death,
is/was
> imprisoned for "playing down the holocaust".
>
> Recently it is permitted to claim that not more than 356.000 people
(Jews
> and non-Jews) fell victim to Zyklon B in Auschwitz.
>
> Four public prosecutor's offices - in Berlin, Stuttgart, Bochum and
> Bielefeld - have so far voiced their opinion along this line.
>
> The public prosecutor's office in Stuttgart has refused to charge,
for
> violation of § 130 sects. 3 and 4 StGB [penal code], the main
editor of the
> SPIEGEL, Fritjof Meyer, for writing, and the former president of the
> Bundestag, Prof. Dr. Rita Süßmuth, for publishing the article "Die
Zahl der
> Opfer von Auschwitz - Neue Erkenntnisse durch neue Archivfunde"
[The Number
> of Victims of Auschwitz - New Insights due to new Findings in the
Archives]
> (in the magazine Osteuropa, 5/2002, p. 631 ff.). In this article
Meyer put
> forward and substantiated the thesis that throughout the time of
the German
> occupation of the concentration camp Auschwitz a total of 510.000
people
> died, of which probably 356.000 "im Gas" (Jews and non-Jews). The
relevant
> note of termination was added to file reference 4 Js 75185/02 on
28.05.03.
>
> How is it to be explained that the figure of the number of victims
is now
> also "officially" clearly melting away like snow in the vernal sun?
Is this
> due to the fact, communicated by Fritjof Meyer, that the former
commanding
> officer of Auschwitz, Rudolf Höß, confessed imaginary figures under
torture
> - presumably expecting that their lack of relation to reality would
soon be
> recognised, and that by these means the awareness would be directed
to the
> conditions under which these testimonies were made?
>
> Within the framework of the "Campaign against the Obviousness of the
> Holocaust" citizens of the Reich copied the article by Meyer, sent
it to a
> number of prominent figures of the political and cultural scene of
the FRG,
> and finally reported themselves for violation of § 130 sect. 4
StGB, to the
> district attorney Neumann in Berlin.
>
> In explanation of this step, the citizens of the Reich who reported
> themselves stated:
>
> The murder of the soul of the German People, the genocide committed
by
> Israel and the persecution of the Holocaust-disbelievers, has to
stop. The
> uprising against the world domination of the Jews has begun in
Palestine
> with the second Intifada. The struggle for liberation now continues
in
> Germany, with the attack against the dogma of the 6 million gassed
Jews.
>
> It was Martin Walser who, in his speech in the Paul's Church, was
the first
> to publicly identify the "Auschwitz-cudgel" as the weapon of our
enemies.
> The main editor of the news magazine DER SPIEGEL, Fritjof Meyer,
has now
> taken a swing at the Holocaust religion which will destroy it. In
his
> article "Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz - Neue Erkenntnisse durch
neue
> Archivfunde", published in the scientific magazine Osteuropa, no. 5
from May
> 2002, he rejects the figure of 6 million gassed Jews. In contrast to
> numerous historians, Fritjof Meyer does not deny the murders in the
gas
> chambers, but maintains that only 356.000 were killed in this
manner in
> Auschwitz. That is not more people than Jewish nuclear physicists
burned in
> the fire of "Little Boy" in Hiroshima within a few minutes on the
6th of
> August 1945, with the nuclear bomb they had built. No fewer people
found an
> agonising death in Dresden, on the 13th of February 1945, in the
firestorm
> that scientists of HRH the King of Great Britain had planned. This
figure
> reaches nowhere near to the two million Germans who - after they had
> surrendered their weapons - were killed by General Dwight D.
Eisenhower on
> the meadows of the Rhine with the hunger-weapon. This figure is
also far
> smaller than the number of Germans worked to death as work-slaves
in the
> Soviet camps. And it is only a tenth of the two to three million
dead of the
> genocide of expulsion, that was perpetrated against the Germans of
the
> eastern territories of the German Reich.
>
> If the number of victims that was established by Fritjof Meyer is
correct,
> then "the Holocaust", in the sense of a "unique and incomparable
crime of
> mankind", did not take place. We reject Jewish moral, according to
which
> only murder of a Jew is a crime, whereas the brutal death of a non-
Jew is
> rather a welcome event, as a contemptuous conviction.
>
> So far three notifications of termination have been issued by the
relevant
> public prosecutor's offices, in accordance with § 170 sect. 2 StPO
> (insufficient grounds for suspicion): in the case of Edgar Forster,
StA
> [public prosecutor's office] Bochum from 06.05.03, file reference
33 Js
> 145/03, in the case of Ursula Haverbeck, StA Bielefeld from
27.05.06, file
> reference 46 Js 171/03, and in the case of Imke Barnstedt, StA
Berlin from
> 10.06.03, file reference 81 Js 1564/03. The result of this campaign
draws
> the attention to the proclamation to the Jews of the whole world,
as it was
> formulated by citizens of the Reich in the Verden Manifesto from
the 5th of
> February 2003, in the following words:
>
> In the brave deed of the editor of the SPIEGEL, Fritjof Meyer, we
see the
> signal for the begin of the uprising against the oppressors of the
German
> People. We do not throw stones at the occupiers, but in the spirit
of
> Mahatma Gandhi we will copy Meyer's article and distribute it, in
order to
> testify for the German Reich, out of free choice, in front of the
courts of
> the regime which serves the obliteration of the Reich, and which
calls
> itself "Federal Republic of Germany". We accuse the Judeo-American
empire of
> not only having instigated World War II, in order to obtain, secure
and
> expand the domination of the world, but also, of having, after the
end of
> the war, globally caused the violent deaths of 12 to 16 million
people.
>
> The dead are now lifting up their voices through us, to call to the
Jews:
>
> "That's enough! Many Peoples bled in the 20th century. Let the
world finally
> settle down and allow peace to reign! Do not desire the land of an
innocent
> People just because it was promised to you by a bloodthirsty god
3500 years
> ago. End the world war that you are currently trying to instigate.
Go into
> yourselves and renounce Yahweh, for he takes pleasure in genocide!
Submit
> yourselves to the Peoples who will receive you as brothers, if you
too will
> honour them as brothers. Realise that your chosenness is a curse
and that
> you will perish in the flames of hate that leap to meet you from
those who
> you despise as animals."
>
> The Holy German Reich lives, to summon the Jews to the world court!
>
> * * *
>
> Account of the action on the 30th of July 2003 at the Wartburg:
>
> The Uprising for the Truth began at the Wartburg.
>
>
> Where Martin Luther - having been excommunicated by the Pope and
declared an
> outlaw of the Reich by the German Kaiser - once translated the New
Testament
> under the protection of the Teutonic Knights, where on the 18th of
October
> 1817 on the occasion of the fourth anniversary of the People's
Battle of
> Leipzig against Napoleonic foreign rule 500 students gathered for
the
> Wartburg celebration - the first civilian-democratic gathering in
Germany -
> under the motto "Honour - Freedom - Fatherland" in order to fight
for a
> unified national state, citizens of the German Reich lifted up
their voice
> on the 30th of July 2003 for the truth:
>
> "There was no Holocaust."
>
> "Truth conquers."
>
> "The lie destroys itself."
>
> "The German Reich regains consciousness in the uprising of the
German
> People."
>
> echoed their calls from the walls of this proud castle.
>
> Originally, this proclamation was to have taken place on the 30th
of July
> 2003 in Auschwitz, in order to mark this place of Jewish ritual
worship as
> the scene of the crime of the spiritual murder of the German People.
>
> Thanks to the friendly support of Brandenburg's Minister of the
Interior,
> Schönboom, who forbade Horst Mahler - the initiator of this action -
the
> departure from the country into Poland, this purpose was achieved,
due to
> the echo of the media, without the physical presence of the heralds
of truth
> in Auschwitz.
>
> Due to conspicuous movements of the supporters of the Verden
Manifesto from
> the 5th of February 2003 in the German lands, and corresponding
telephone
> calls - which were meant to be bugged, and were indeed listened
into (which
> became noticeable through unmotivated inquiries by the CID after
Horst
> Mahler at possible meeting places in Thuringia) - the occupying
power had
> been led to believe that a substitute event would take place at the
location
> of the former concentration camp Buchenwald (near Weimar). An
armada of
> motorised observation troops of the official spying service was
sent into
> this area, who - unsuccessfully - attempted, in a cat-and-mouse
game on
> motorways and country roads lasting several hours, to unsettle the
citizens
> of the Reich who were determined to execute the liberating deed.
(The driver
> of the vehicle IK-G 135 distinguished himself especially; but the
driver of
> IK-VT xxx was also not bad.) At Buchenwald, uniformed police forces
lay in
> wait in order to hinder the public appearance of the citizens of
the Reich.
>
> In fact however, the Wartburg had been chosen for the decisive
event, due to
> its charisma as a location of German history. The citizens of the
Reich who
> were prepared for the communal deed gathered like lightning on the
best
> situated lookout platform under the castle, in order to put an end
to the
> obsequious grovelling towards the Holocaust religion by means of a
solemn
> ceremony. Here they were left alone by the surprised occupying
power. Only a
> camera team of the official spying service - the only one it seems,
that was
> not shaken off through driving manoeuvres - was present and filmed
the
> scene.
>
> The solemn celebration was opened by Horst Mahler with an
invocation of the
> German folk-spirit:
>
>
> Sieghafter Geist
> Durchflamme die Ohnmacht
> Zaghafter Seelen.
> Verbrenne die Ichsucht,
> Entzünde das Mitleid,
> Daß Selbstlosigkeit,
> Der Lebensstrom der Menschheit,
> Wallt als Quelle,
> Der geistigen Wiedergeburt.
> Victorious Spirit
> Blaze through the unconsciousness
> Of timid souls.
> Consume egotism,
> Ignite compassion,
> That selflessness,
> The life-stream of humanity,
> May flow as the source
> Of spiritual rebirth.
>
> Rudolf Steiner, on the 20th of September 1919
>
>
> After a quiet reflection he then uttered the four sentences which
contain
> everything, which were each repeated by two speakers from the
circle of the
> Reich citizens that were present:
>
> Truth conquers!
>
> The lie destroys itself!
>
> There was no Holocaust!
>
> The German Reich regains consciousness in the uprising of the
German People.
>
> Throughout the ceremony fluttered the black-white-red flag of the
> Kaiser-Reich that had been restored in 1871, and the flag of the
Deutsches
> Kolleg - a lying black cross in a golden bed on a red field - which
is
> recommended as the state symbol of the German Reich that is
regaining its
> consciousness. Between the flags fluttered a metre-long scroll
containing
> over a hundred names of people who were persecuted, and in part are
still
> being persecuted, by the Jewish occupying power as "revisionists"
and
> "Holocaust deniers". They were remembered in gratitude.
>
> The ceremonial event was ended with the hymn:
>
>
> Nichts kann uns rauben
> Liebe und Glauben
> Zu unserem Land.
> Es zu erhalten
> Nothing can rob us
> Of love and faith
> To our country.
> To maintain it
> Und zu gestalten
> Sind wir gesandt.
> Mögen wir sterben,
> Unseren Erben
> Gilt dann die Pflicht
> Es zu erhalten
> Und zu gestalten:
> Deutschland stirbt nicht.
>
> And to organise it
> We have been sent.
> Should we die,
> Our heirs
> Are then obliged
> To maintain it
> And to organise it:
> Germany will not die.
>
>
> After the group returned to the parking area to their cars,
following a
> two-hour sojourn at the Wartburg, CID officers of the FRG - the
> "organisational form of a modality of foreign rule" (Carlo Schmid) -
> approached Horst Mahler and informed him that an investigation had
been
> initiated against him due to suspicion of incitement of the People.
The
> reason given for this step was that "a banner with inciting
contents" was
> exhibited during the proclamation at the Wartburg. The leader of
the CID
> commando was unable to recite the wording of this banner. "There was
> something about 'Holocaust' to be read." The officers made a
listless
> impression.
>
> Circa 10km away from the Wartburg, the vehicle driven by Ursula
Haverbeck
> was stopped on the return journey to Vlotho by four cars of the
official
> spying service. The front-seat passenger - a GP from Bochum - was
commanded
> to leave the vehicle by uniformed police officials with a drawn
pistol. The
> vehicle was then thoroughly searched - including the luggage. As a
result of
> this search the banners which had been exhibited at the Wartburg,
as well as
> the scroll with the names of the Holocaust-persecuted, fell into
the hands
> of the police.
>
> At the same time that the ceremony at the Wartburg was taking
place, the CD
> "Aufstand für die Wahrheit - Auschwitz am 30. Juli 2003" [Uprising
for the
> Truth - Auschwitz on the 30th of July 2003] which had been produced
and
> published by Horst Mahler on occasion of the planned visit to the
scene of
> the crime, was sent to roughly 300 of the most important media,
diplomatic
> deputies, as well as opinion forming personalities at home and
abroad.
>
> This CD contains the following text and picture files (English
files are
> underlined):
>
> 1. Horst Mahler: Das Deutsche Reich steht auf für die Wahrheit
(7/03)
> 2. Horst Mahler: The German Reich arises for the Truth (translation
of
> no. 1)
> 3. Verdener Manifest (2/03)
> 4. Appell der 100
> 5. Horst Mahler: Offener Brief an Bundeskanzler Gerhard Schröder
> (11/99)
> 6. Horst Mahler: Offener Brief an die Abgeordneten des 15. Deutschen
> Bundestages (5/03)
> 7. Dokumentation: Fritjof Meyer über Opferzahlen von Auschwitz
> 8. Tabelle mit Opferzahlen
> 9. Horst Mahler: Erfolge im Feldzug gegen die Offenkundigkeit des
> Holocaust
> 10. To be passed on - Success in the campaign against the Holocaust
> religion (translation of no. 9)
> 11. Horst Mahler: Revisionsbegründung im Verfahren gegen Frank
Rennicke
> (1/03)
> 12. Horst Mahler: Judaismus und Christentum - Unverträgliche
> Menschenbilder (8/02)
> 13. Karl Marx: Zur Judenfrage
> 14. Deutsches Kolleg: Endlösung der Judenfrage (3/01)
> 15. Deutsches Kolleg: Final Solution of the Jewish Question
(translation
> of no. 14)
> 16. Horst Mahler: Offener Brief an Daniel Goldhagen
> 17. Deutsches Kolleg: Ausrufung des Aufstandes der Anständigen
> 18. Deutsches Kolleg: Zur Heilsgeschichtlichen Lage des Deutschen
> Reiches
> 19. Deutsches Kolleg: The Redeeming Historical Role of the German
Reich
> (I) (translation of no. 18)
> 20. Deutsches Kolleg: The Redeeming Historical Role of the German
Reich
> (II) (translation of no. 18 contd. and of no. 21)
> 21. Deutsches Kolleg: An den Ewigen Bund der Deutschen Fürsten (mit
> Aufstandsplan)
> 22. Protokolle der Weisen von Zion
> 23. Horst Mahler: "Antisemiten" aller Länder vereinigt Euch!
> 24. Carlo Schmid: Rede vor dem Parlamentarischen Rat vom 8.
September
> 1948
> 25. Horst Mahler: Skizze für eine neue Reichsordnung (11/99)
> 26. Horst Mahler: Heil Juda, wir kommen (4/02)
> 27. Horst Mahler: Den Juden ist die Darstellung des satanischen
Prinzips
> zugeschickt (6/03)
> 28. Eine Korrespondenz: Die Völker im Stande der Notwehr gegen Jahwe
> (12/02)
> 29. Horst Mahler: Guten Tag und Shalom! - Eine Kriegserklärung an
die
> Judenheit (6/03)
> 30. Deutsches Kolleg: Independence Day - live (9/01)
> 31. Deutsches Kolleg: Independence Day - live (translation of no.
30)
> 32. Deutsches Kolleg: Der Untergang des Judäo-Amerikanischen
Emperiums
> (11/01)
> 33. Deutsches Kolleg: The Fall of the Judeo-American Empire
(translation
> of no. 32)
> 34. Horst Mahler: Thesen über die Moderne
> 35. Horst Mahler: Thesen über Juden und Deutschland als geistige
Notwehr
> (7/99)
> 36. Horst Mahler: Die Macht der Lüge - Worum geht es? (1/03)
> 37. Horst Mahler: Auf dem Wege zur Reichsordnung (11/99)
> 38. Horst Mahler: Sinn der Shoa (3/99)
> 39. Giselher Wirsing: Erziehung zum Krieg (excerpt from "Der Maßlose
> Kontinent")
> 40. Hamilton Fish: Pearl Harbor (excerpt from "Der zerbrochene
Mythos")
> 41. Dirk Bavendamm: Roosevelts Krieg (excerpt)
> 42. Die Septemberlüge (Bilderschau und Revisionsschrift mit
> Beweisanträgen)
> 43. Flugblatt: Das Deutsche Volk erzwingt die Untersuchung der
> Ereignisse vom 11.09.01
> 44. Horst Mahler: Der Globalismus als höchstes Stadium des
Imperialismus
> 45. Die Deutschen proben den aufrechten Gang
>
> The enemies of the German Reich should know that henceforth, every
trial
> because of "incitement of the People" due to criticism of Jewry and
the
> public profession of the historical truth will become a boomerang.
The way
> was paved by the main editor of the news magazine DER SPIEGEL,
Fritjof Meyer
> (Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz in the magazine Osteuropa no.
5/2002, p.
> 631 ff.). Due to new findings in the archives he gives the number
of people
> who died from gas in Auschwitz as 356.000 (Jews and non-Jews). Even
though
> he is, in contrast to the ever increasing number of "revisionist"
> historians, still sticking to the gas chamber version, his essay is
> groundbreaking because the public prosecutors of the occupying power
> capitulated before the power of the SPIEGEL and declared Meyer's
theory to
> be "irrelevant concerning criminal law".
>
> Between the "official" figure of first 4 million then 1.5 million
dead due
> to gassing in Auschwitz, and the figure claimed by Meyer, is a
difference
> that can only be explained by the fact that the "official" version
is based
> on lies and fabrications. One can now, based on the findings of
Meyer, argue
> against the Auschwitz Lie with the prospect of success in the
centre of
> society, and not only at its "right-wing fringe".
>
> The knowledge of the truth is increasing dramatically, the lie is
> collapsing. The Jewish power will disappear with it. The Judeo-
American
> empire will soon tumble and crash to the ground.
> What a celebration that will be!
>
>
> Verden an der Aller, on the 31st of July 2003
>
>
>
> Attachment 02
>
> Excerpt from the constitutional complaint for Frank Rennicke
>
> Preface
>
> For the purpose of defending the freedom of the citizen of the
Reich, Frank
> Rennicke, the signatory, with the following statement of reasons, is
> claiming the catalogue of basic rights of the Basic Law (GG) for
the Federal
> Republic of Germany - in limits - as the right of the German Reich,
and the
> Federal Constitutional Court as a German court.
>
> Based on the speech of the expert for national and international
right,
> Prof. Dr. Carlo Schmid, before the Parliamentary Council on the 8th
of
> September 1948, this is done in the awareness that the Basic Law is
not a
> constitution (cf. art. 146 GG) but a modality of the occupiers'
statute of
> the Western victorious powers; that the Federal republic of Germany
is not a
> state but the "organisational form of a modality of foreign rule"
and that
> consequently, the Federal Constitutional Court is neither a
constitutional
> court nor a court of the German national state: the German Reich.
>
> All who argue against this view of things, with the time that has
lapsed and
> the many elections that have taken place in the mean time, have to
bear in
> mind:
>
> 1. At no point in time has there been a free expression of thoughts
or a
> free election in the Federal Republic: The NSDAP as well as all its
organs
> and successor organisations were banned in May 1945 by the
victorious powers
> under breach of art. 43 of the Hague Rules on Land Warfare from
1907.
> In its issue no. 20/2003 the news magazine DER SPIEGEL reported on
page 47
> of an opinion poll in the year 1948. According to this poll, 57% of
the
> Germans were at that time still of the opinion that National
Socialism had
> been a good idea. It is only the "re-education" of the Germans -
which is in
> breach of international right - that has been continuing for half a
century
> now, that may have brought about a change in this. The decisive
factor would
> here be the lie of the 6 million Jews that were exterminated
through gas.
> [The development of the Soviet Union that has demised, may serve as
a
> contrast here: The Communist Party of the Soviet Union which was
responsible
> for the physical extermination of 30 million self-employed Russian
farmers,
> which was actually planned and executed by Stalin's son-in-law, the
Jew
> Kaganowitsch, was not banned after the collapse of the Bolshevik
system. Its
> successor organisation is represented in the Duma and currently
plays an
> important part in Russia.]
> The political convictions of the majority of the Germans were
therefore
> permanently excluded, from the very beginning, from any form
of "democratic"
> will formation. Still in the covering letter of the "German"
governments -
> the FRG and GDR - to the 2+4 Treaty, the obligation of the federal
> government to suppress parties which contain National Socialist
thoughts is
> emphasised.
> 2. It is clearly expressed with the new version of article 146 GG ,
which
> was passed with the Treaty of Unification, that even in the opinion
of the
> vassal regime the Basic Law is not enhanced to be a constitution of
the
> German People through the right that can be deduced from habit.
>
> This clarification, which was unheard of until then, is
indispensable at
> this juncture because the subject of examination is the Holocaust
> legislation of this foreign rule and the activity of the courts
which is
> based upon it, which - as is to be shown - cannot under any
viewpoint
> whatsoever be recognised as either a part of the German system of
laws or as
> the confirmation of German jurisdiction.
>
> It could appear to be a contradiction that, in order to defend
himself
> against the arbitrariness of the victors over the German Reich, a
citizen of
> the Reich calls to an organ of the foreign rule with the desire to
declare
> their Holocaust legislation - which at heart is the core of the
Talmudic
> foreign rule over the German People - null and void.
>
> This contradiction solves itself in the recognition that the
persons who act
> as "Judges of the Federal Constitution" do not themselves belong to
the
> foreign rule, but are merely their vassals. They are at once
citizens of the
> German Reich and are obliged in loyalty to it.
>
> In itself, vassalage is not a crime. Under the circumstances of
military
> defeat this can even be the "lesser evil" in contrast to a public
military
> dictatorship of the victorious forces. Since the purpose of history
is
> freedom, the condition of vassalage can only ever be accepted for a
> restricted period of time. In particular, it turns into treason,
i.e. a
> crime worthy of death, when it becomes recognisable that the
foreign power
> misuses the peace of the land, which is being upheld by the vassal
> government, in order to murder the soul of the German People, using
the
> weapons of psychological warfare, with the declared purpose -
however
> forgotten by the victim - to destroy the German Reich and its German
> state-folk for all eternity.
>
> With his refusal to let the German army participate in the USA's
illegal
> raid against Iraq, Gerhard Schröder has, as chancellor of Germany,
publicly
> marked the beginning of the end of the vassalage. An in-depth
study - as
> document study so to speak - of the book of the German-Austrian
analyst and
> governmental advisor Gerhoch Reisegger, "Wir werden schamlos
irregeführt",
> Hohenrain Verlag 2003, informs about how the Judeo-American empire
is
> inwardly already in a process of demise, and that its external
universal
> violence is an expression of this fact. The avalanche that will
bury the
> "New World Order", which was unilaterally proclaimed by the USA,
within a
> period of time of 10 years at the most, has been set off with the
feigned
> "Attack on America" on the 11th of September 2001. No power of the
world can
> now hinder it. The junta which disposes over the USA has instigated
the
> Third World War. Only a successful coup d'état of the US military
against
> the Jewish rule over the USA, and the physical liquidation of the
> September-crooks, could avert the catastrophe. The face of the
world is now
> rapidly changing. Millions upon millions - if not indeed billions -
of
> people will lose their lives in this war. Under these circumstances
every
> citizen of the German Reich who has entered into the service of the
foreign
> rule, is called to remember his Germanness and to act in the spirit
of
> Tauroggen , in order to paralyse the foreign rule and to support the
> struggle for freedom of the German Reich according to his
possibilities.
>
> The world-wide Talmudic despotism - in its current stadium - is on
the whole
> based on four lies of the century:
>
> 1. On the War Guilt Lie: that the German Reich wilfully brought
about
> the First and the Second World War.
> 2. On the Pearl Harbour Lie: that the USA were attacked by Japan.
> 3. On the Auschwitz Lie: that the German Reich systematically
murdered
> 4 million Jews in the concentration camp Auschwitz through poison
gas, in
> accordance with a general decision of extermination.
> 4. On the September Lie: that the USA were attacked on the 11th of
> September 2001 by "Osama bin Laden's network of terror".
>
> The words that Jesus directed at the leader of the Jews, and that
are passed
> down in the gospel according to St. John (8:44), are valid to this
day:
>
> Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye
will do. He
> was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,
because there
> is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own:
for he
> is a liar and the father of it.
>
> Frank Rennicke's struggle against the courts of the foreign rule is
not a
> legal masterstroke. It is a battle in the struggle for freedom of
the German
> People. If the signatory was to restrict himself to a traditional
legal
> argumentation in this struggle, then that would be the equivalent
to party
> treason, for he would participate in covering up the nature of this
> confrontation and would submit himself to the conceptuality of the
enemies
> of the Reich.
>
>
> I.
>
> The course of the proceedings and the extent of the complaint
>
> On the 22nd of November 2000 the magistrates' court of Böblingen
sentenced
> the affected to a prison sentence of ten months, the execution of
which was
> suspended, due to incitement of the People in eight cases, six of
which in
> union of deed with an offence against § 21 of the GjSM [act
concerning the
> dissemination of writings and media contents which endanger the
youth].
>
> Both the affected, with the aim of being cleared of the charges,
and the
> public prosecutor's office, with the aim of obtaining a higher
sentence,
> appealed against this sentence in accordance with formality and
within the
> stipulated period.
>
> The appeal of the affected was unsuccessful. The appeal of the
public
> prosecutor's office was partially successful. After hearing the
appeal, the
> district court of Stuttgart sentenced the affected to a prison
sentence of 1
> year and 5 months. The sentence was suspended. The following
regulations
> were implemented: §§ 130 sects. 1 - 4 StGB; 21 sect. 1 nos. 1, 2,
3a; 4
> sect. 1 nos. 1 and 2; 3 sect. 1 no. 4; 6 GjSM, 52, 53, 56 StGB. The
sentence
> was formally delivered to the signatory on the 11th of December
2002.
>
> Contained in the complete sentence, is a sentence which is to be
implemented
> due to the conviction according to § 130 sect. 4 StGB, because of
the
> distribution of the brochure "Dokumente der Verteidigung.
Unterdrückte
> Tatsachen über Auschwitz und den Holocaust" [Documents of defence.
> Suppressed facts about Auschwitz and the Holocaust]. The court of
appeal
> concluded at singles:
>
> "With this he (the accused, Frank Rennicke) followed the purpose of
bringing
> this brochure to the attention of a further, undefined but larger
circle of
> people, especially of like-minded persons, but also to other
disseminators,
> beyond the first recipient Marco Rieger. The accused, Frank
Rennicke, was
> aware of the fact that this brochure denies the genocide against
the Jews
> and gypsies in the concentration camps, especially in Auschwitz,
during the
> National Socialist tyranny (so-called Auschwitz Lie). In the form
of a
> pseudo scientific presentation (Leuchter Report/Rudolf Report) it is
> expounded over 30 pages that the murder of the Jews and gypsies by
the Nazi
> regime was not possible due to technical and factual reasons, and
that it
> also did not take place, at least not on the scale reckoned by
recognised
> historians.
>
> Amongst other things, it states:
> "After reviewing all of the material and inspecting all of the
sites at
> Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, your author finds the evidence
> overwhelming. There were no execution gas chambers at any of these
> locations. It is the best engineering opinion of this author that
the
> alleged gas chambers at the inspected sites could nor have then
been, or
> now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution
gas
> chambers."
> This is signed by Fred Leuchter.
>
> Simultaneously there is a call to disseminate these supposedly
> scientifically proven claims, in the appendix of this brochure."
>
> The appeal of the affected against this was aimed at demonstrating,
by means
> of fundamental expositions, the contradiction that exists between
the legal
> opinion which formed the basis of the decision of the court of
appeal on the
> one hand, and the interpretation of the Basic Law (which was passed
under
> the supreme authority of the Western victorious powers) in the
interest of
> the German People on the other hand.
>
> This procedure is problematic. Contradictory patterns of thought,
i.e. ones
> which exclude each other, hit upon each other. The viewpoint that
is to be
> suspected amongst the judges could be based on power. That of the
defence of
> the affected, has been exposed to demonisation for decades and is
wholly
> powerless. Since the thinking of both poles refers to the same
subject, the
> differing ways of thinking are in relation to one another. This is
laden
> with complexes of feelings which hinder the free flow of the
thoughts.
>
> It seems useful to bring this to attention. It could happen that
the court
> remembers that thoughts - this includes the realm of legal
arguments - are
> not to be assessed according to whether they are "politically
correct" or
> not, but according to whether they are correct or incorrect, true
or false.
> It may well happen that the odd thought will strike one like a
punch in the
> stomach and wind the person. Then it helps to take a deep breath
and ask
> oneself: "Hmm, why not?" With this simple question one frees
oneself from
> the thought taboos which make us the slaves of foreign powers. This
advice
> could here be especially helpful because the Jewish Question will,
in the
> following, be examined in an unheard of manner. The taboo of all
taboos will
> be shamelessly violated, for the search for truth does not tolerate
any
> taboos.
>
> The circumstances favour this attempt. The power that tries to
dictate our
> thoughts has exposed itself as a criminal power through the
feigned "Attack
> on America" from the 11th of September 2001. What this power is
moved by at
> heart and what it aims at, has been expertly revealed in
unsurpassed quality
> by Gerhoch Reisegger in his book "Wir werden schamlos irregeführt -
Vom 11.
> September bis zum Irak-Krieg", Hohenrain Verlag, Tübingen 2003.
>
> By court order, in accordance with § 349 sect. 2 StPO from the 17th
of July
> 2003, the court of appeal has rejected the appeal of the affected as
> unfounded "because the re-examination of the sentence ... did not
come
> across a legal incorrectness that disadvantages the accused."
>
> The Federal Constitutional Court can also - as it has the power to
do so -
> ignore the proof that the sentence of the affected is founded on
> arbitrariness. The refusal to take note of the facts and their
connection
> would, however, result in the reproach of treason and perversion of
the
> course of justice, due to the principle of actio libera in causa.
The time
> of the "organisational form of a modality of foreign rule" (Carlo
Schmid) -
> (OMF), which has given itself the name "Federal Republic of
Germany", has
> run out. Under the pressure of the catastrophe that is hurtling
towards us
> (cf. Gerhoch Reisegger) the German People will regain its ability
to act in
> the uprising for the organification of the German Reich (cf. art.
146 GG).
>
> The grounds for appeal which were presented to the regional court
of appeal
> were nothing other than the anticipated reasoning for the
constitutional
> complaint. The part which deals with the Auschwitz complex is here
newly
> presented:
>
> ......
>
> ......
>
> IV.
>
> Reprimands concerning complex B: "Documents of the defence"
>
> ......
> [Retrievable under
> http://www.deutsches-
kolleg.org/hm/aktuelles/Revisionsbegruendung_Rennicke.h
> tm]
>
> That was the excerpt from the grounds for appeal.
>
>
> The violations of the basic rights at singles:
>
> Through the implementation of § 130 sects. 3 and 4 StGB, art. 1
sect. 1 GG
> has been violated. The sovereign power unduly claims for itself to
fuse the
> convictions of the people who live in its sphere of influence with
a decreed
> truth. That is the negation of the spiritualness of the average
addressee.
> The normative statement of the objective constitutional right, that
the
> dignity of man is sacrosanct, contains a value statement which in
itself
> however, is based on a statement of a condition of being. This
condition of
> being - the "dignity of man" - which "is" independent of space and
time and
> which "is to be" legally realised, is constituted of the following:
Every
> human is a human due to his spirit which lifts him above impersonal
nature,
> and which enables him, through his own decision, to become
conscious of
> himself, determine himself and to shape his environment (similarly
Wintrich,
> Grundrechte p. 6, 15; Festschrift für Apelt p. 1 ff.; BayVBl. 58,
100; cf.
> also Marcic, Vom Gesetzesstaat zum Richterstaat, 1957, p. 313 ff.).
[Dürig
> in Dürig-Maunz, Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, art. 1 margin no. 17]
>
> Apart from the fact that no person is able to become conscious of
himself
> "through his own decision" - just as nobody is born into this
world "through
> his own decision" - this commentary is the rock in the surf of
opinions
> which argue amongst themselves for the most diverse pictures of man
(cf. to
> this point the former constitutional judge Prof. Dr. Ernst-Wolfgang
> Böckenförde, Vom Wandel des Menschenbildes im Recht, Rhema-Verlag,
2001).
>
> The spiritualness of a person is a condition of being, i.e.
something which
> can normatively neither be questioned nor formed. Rather, this is
the reason
> of the inner sense of all statements whose logic is determined by
a "You
> shall".
>
> Whichever contents the spirit may receive through examples,
teaching of
> faith, tradition, education and upbringing in associating with his
own kin:
> these are all, without exception, merely the malleable material at
which the
> subjective spirit forms itself through its own spiritual work and
carves
> itself out toward conviction. It is only the conviction which has
been
> worked out by oneself, which is this inner steadfastness, without
which
> human existence is a miserable there-being. This innermost being of
the
> spirit is only made true through its expression. Conviction is the
light
> which is shed upon everything in which the person is interested. It
> determines all possible decisions of the person and is in itself
actuality
> (the emphasis being on the verb 'to act'). The suppression of the
expression
> of a conviction is forced hindrance of a dignified existence, for
only in
> the expression of his core being does man have dignity. A core
being which
> does not express itself is not actual. An expression which is not
the
> expression of an innermost being is undignified. The arrogance of
being able
> to determine that a certain conviction is not at all possible due
to the
> "obviousness of the contrary" - e.g. the conviction that the mass
> extermination of Jews is a false claim - is the eternally futile
attempt to
> destroy the spirit. This attempt does not destroy the spirit, but
those who
> try to kill it. Any further comment is superfluous.
>
> Article 1 sect. 3 GG is violated insofar as the expert courts have
declared
> the affected to be an outlaw, without basing their decision on
valid law by
> means of a legal argumentation. His case is a further example for
the
> general decision of the "organisational form of a modality of
foreign rule"
> (OMF) to declare people as outlaws who do not bow down to the
foreign
> power's dictates of conviction ("political correctness").
>
> Article 2 sect. 1 GG is violated insofar as the refusal to allow the
> affected to be part of the peace of right, robs him of the
possibility to
> communicate his convictions to other people in the normal way
without
> exposing himself to the danger of criminal persecution and social
ostracism.
> In this case, the fanning out of the general right of freedom into
specific
> basic rights (freedom of opinion, freedom of worship, freedom of
assembly)
> covers only sections. The unspecific effect of discrimination
which "deniers
> of the Holocaust" (as sinners against "political correctness" - pc -
) are
> exposed to, extends further than the protective realm of these
specific
> rights of freedom.
>
> As is shown by the sentences of the expert courts in the case of the
> affected, this ostracism at once causes pigeonholing into patterns
of bias,
> which are resistant against criticism, and which cannot be broken
by means
> of legal redress.
>
> After the abandonment of the theory that the valid relationship
between the
> state and the citizen influences the relationship of private people
> (Drittwirkungstheorie), the affected remains wholly unprotected in
the
> private realm (cf. Dürig in Dürig-Maunz, Kommentar zum Grundgesetz,
art. 3
> sect. 1 margin no. 505 ff.).
>
> The "Uprising of the Decent" which Chancellor Schröder longed for,
against
> the "Nazis", "neo-nazis", "right-wing extremists" and "right-wing
radicals"
> has led to proper campaigns of extermination in the realm of
private right:
> bank accounts, jobs and tenancy agreements of the affected are
terminated.
> Pressure of expulsion is created through the mobilisation of
animosities in
> their area of living (distribution of "wanted" posters with picture
and the
> slogan "Nazis, get out!", gathering into mobs in front of their
homes,
> waylaying and attacking, break-ins with serious destruction of
fixtures and
> fittings, ignition of cars parked in front of the house, etc.) by
the OMF's
> gangs of thugs (known as "Antifa"). Ultimately, there will probably
soon be
> protective (custody) camps into which the affected can flee to save
their
> health and their lives. For, the protective guarding of the
targets - to
> which the signatory belongs since the 31st of July 2003 -, from the
armed
> mobs is far too costly for it to be generally implemented for a
longer
> period of time. In connection with the criminal proceedings due to
> "incitement of the People", which are the subject of the complaint,
the
> affected and his family are acutely exposed to this pressure of
expulsion
> and are forced to find a place to live in an area which is less
hateful.
>
> Article 3 sect. 1 GG is violated insofar as the loss of rights
negates the
> equality before the law of the affected (Ipsen, VVDStRL 10 - 1952 -
80 ff.).
> The reason for his unequal treatment is his viewpoint, which is
> discriminated from above. Not permitted to be expressed is the
opinion that,
> under consideration of the supposed circumstances of the deeds, the
> assertion that 6 million Jews were systematically killed with the
poison gas
> "Zyklon B" in the territory of the German Reich's sovereignty, is
> incompatible with the laws of nature. This opinion is considered to
be
> political because it aims - so it is claimed - at the restoration
of the
> Germans' sense of self-esteem, and because it burdens - so it is
said - the
> relation to the Jewish minority in the FRG as a result of this. By
these
> means, the guarantee of the equal treatment of political opinions
as it is
> concretised in art. 3 sect. 3 GG is disregarded.
>
> Article 4 sect. 1 GG is violated because § 130 sects. 3 and 4 StGB
has as
> its object the discrimination of National Socialist ideology and its
> philosophical relatives. It follows from the legal texts that with
this
> punitive form "a political signal against right-wing extremist and
neo-nazi
> developments" is to be set (v. Bubnoff in Leipziger Kommentar, 11th
edition,
> 1996, margin no. 42 to § 130). The punishable denying, or rather
playing
> down, of the Holocaust is meant to be proof of "anti-constitutional
> right-wing extremism". With the sanction one wants to strike at
this and
> nothing else. In the sense of this clarification of the normative
aim,
> "anti-constitutional right-wing extremism" is first and foremost the
> philosophy which determined National Socialism. This philosophy
however, is
> protected by article 4 sect. 1 GG just like all other ideological
and
> religious confessions.
>
> The attempt to exclude the National Socialist ideology from this
protective
> realm, due to its supposed racist and anti-humanitarian contents, by
> constructing an immanent boundary of the basic rights out of art.
139 GG, is
> doomed to failure. "There is no room in the system of the GG for a
type of
> 'special regulation for the right'." (Herzog in
Maunz/Dürig/Herzog/Scholz,
> Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, art. 139 margin no. 4).
>
> It must not be overlooked that first and foremost, Judaism would be
affected
> by such an immanent boundary. As has been demonstrated ... the
Jewish
> religion and ideology is to this day characterised by racism and
misanthropy
> to a degree that is without equal in European history.
>
> In order to show that this assessment of the Jews is not due to
Teutonic
> wrath, the thoughts of the former British foreign secretary, Ernest
Bevin,
> are here presented (he was the successor of Anthony Eden when the
Labour
> Party formed the first post-war government in Britain). His
parliamentary
> permanent secretary, Christopher Mayhew, noted in his diary (May
1948):
> "There is no doubt in my mind that Ernest detests Jews. He makes
the odd
> wisecrack about the 'Chosen People'; declares the Old Testament the
most
> immoral book ever written and says the Jews taught Hitler the
technique of
> terror. 'What could you expect when people are brought up from the
cradle on
> the Old Testament' he said to me." [Source: Avi Davis in Jewsweek
Magazine
> from the 21st of January 2003
> http://www.jewsweek.com/bin/en.jsp?
enPage=BlankPage&enDisplay=view&enDispWha
> t=object&enDispWho=Article%5El17&enZone=Stories&enVersion=0&]
>
> The incompatibility of § 130 sects. 3 and 4 StGB with article 5
sect. 1 GG
> has been convincingly explained by Huster ...
>
> Since this criminal law aims at discriminating against "right-wing
> extremism" - this being admitted by the "lawmaker" - it also
violates the
> ban of article 5 sect. 3 GG.
>
> Article 103 sect. 3 is violated by the dogma of obviousness.
>
> The principle, that the accused is to be granted a legal hearing,
excludes
> treating the characteristics of the legal elements of the offence
and other
> facts, directly relevant as evidence, as being obvious
> (Kleinknecht/Meyer-Goßner, StPO, 45th edition, § 244 margin no. 51
with
> reference to Alsberg/Nüse/Meyer: Der Beweisantrag im Strafprozeß,
5th
> edition, p. 541; LR-Gollwitzer 232 für Schriften mit strafbarem
Inhalt).
>
> The distinguishing feature of the legal element of offence of § 130
sect. 3
> StGB is a deed which connects to "an action committed under the
rule of the
> National Socialists, of the type described in § 220a sect. 1 StGB
> (genocide)".
>
> The Federal German supreme court (BGH) has dismissed this in
continual
> "dispensation of justice" and has, for the application of § 130
sect. 3
> StGB, drawn up the statement that "the millionfold murder of the
Jews in the
> gas chambers of the concentration camps of the Second World War" is
an
> obvious fact in the sense of § 244 sect. 3 sentence 2 StPO (BGHSt
40, 97, 99
> containing further proofs).
>
> Whilst the determination that has been consulted for this is a norm
of
> authorisation (... in these cases the court may neglect taking
evidence), a
> norm of prohibition, whose sanctions are reliable, has practically
been made
> out of this with regard to the so-called Holocaust. Neither is the
court
> permitted to hear evidence on the "Holocaust" nor is the accused,
or rather
> his defence, allowed to put forward a motion to hear the relevant
evidence.
> A defence attorney who disregards this - as in the case of the
attorneys
> Bock and Rieger - is himself persecuted and punished due
to "incitement of
> the People" in accordance with § 130 sect. 3 StGB. It was
demonstrated above
> (...) that this practice has nothing to do with dispensing justice.
>
> Thanks to the research of the historians that are vilified as
> "revisionists", the claim of the enemies of the German Reich, that
millions
> of Jews were killed in the gas chambers of the concentration camps
during
> the National Socialist rule, has long been exposed as a propaganda
lie. This
> has now led to timid corrective attempts from out of the centre of
society,
> obviously, because one fears the fit of rage that could be directed
against
> the Jews - without differentiating between the guilty and innocent -
if the
> truth becomes known to the Germans in particular and the other
Peoples in
> general.
>
> The article that was recently published by the main editor of DER
SPIEGEL,
> Fritjof Meyer, under the patronage of the former president of the
Bundestag,
> Prof. Dr. Rita Süßmuth, in the magazine Osteuropa no. 5/2002 p.
631ff., Die
> Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz - Neue Erkenntisse durch neue
Archivfunde [The
> Number of Victims of Auschwitz - New Insights due to new Findings
in the
> Archives] has now paved the way for a potential breakthrough and
change of
> tactics.
>
> Because of the conviction of the affected due to "incitement of the
People"
> and in order to hinder Meyer's article being covered by silence,
citizens of
> the German Reich began a "Campaign against the Obviousness of the
Holocaust"
> and passed the Verden Manifesto on the 5th of February. This is
documented
> in the appendix (...).
>
> ......
>
> After this report had been written, a notification of termination
from the
> public prosecutor's office in Lüneburg from the 1st of August 2003 -
file
> reference 503 Js 14447/03 -, was issued to a citizen of the Reich
who had
> reported himself for playing down the Holocaust, this termination
being
> remarkable in a number of ways, the most important parts of which
are
> therefore quoted here:
>
> "Concerning your self-report at the public prosecutor's office in
Berlin on
> 07.04.2003
> Dear Herr Marloh,
> due to lack of sufficient suspicion, I have terminated the
preliminary
> proceedings specified above, the competence of which I have assumed
from the
> prosecutor's office in Berlin, in accordance with § 170 sect. 2
StPO.
>
> Your self-report due to incitement of the People is based on the
assumption
> that you fulfilled the offence of incitement of the People in
accordance
> with § 130 sect. 3 and sect. 4 in connection with sect. 2 no. 1a
StGB, by
> simultaneously sending the article published by Fritjof Meyer in the
> magazine Osteuropa, 52nd year, issue 5, May 2002, with the title:
Die Zahl
> der Opfer von Auschwitz - Neue Erkenntnisse durch neue Archivfunde
to the
> members of the German Bundestag Monika Griefahn, Michael Großer-
Brömer and
> Peter Rauen.
>
> A deed committed in the manner described in § 6 of the
International Law
> Penal Code (Völkergesetzbuch) under the rule of the National
Socialists is
> neither denied in Fritjof Meyer's article nor is it played down. In
his
> essay, Meyer reaches the conclusion that a total of 510.000 people
were
> murdered in the National Socialist labour and extermination camp
> Auschwitz-Birkenau, of which 356.000 were murdered in the gas
chambers
> between early 1942 and the beginning of November 1944. Meyer has
therefore
> not denied the National Socialist mass killings in the
extermination camp
> Auschwitz-Birkenau as such. Neither is the genocide committed by the
> National Socialists refuted in this article on the whole, nor is it
claimed
> that mass killings had not been perpetrated, or that these are not
proven.
>
> In as far as that it is conceivable, that actually committed deeds
of
> genocide in the sense of § 130 sect. 3 StGB are played down in this
article,
> an expressly quantitative or qualitative trivialising of the
manner, extent,
> results or immorality of particular or all of the National
Socialist acts of
> violence is necessary, for affirmation of this feature of the
offence in
> respect of the law. With the number of victims he has calculated,
Fritjof
> Meyer may be under the figure which is given in other studies,
however, the
> mere assumption of a lesser number of victims does not suffice to
assume an
> offensive trivialising.
>
> The offence of approval, denial, or trivialising of the genocide
committed
> against the Jewish population under National Socialist rule, was
introduced
> into the punitive offence of § 130 StGB with the Law to Fight Crime
from
> 28.10.94. With this, the lawmaker wanted to contribute to the
hindrance of
> right-wing extremist propaganda. Therefore the criterion of
trivialising is
> only fulfilled if the person who makes the assertion, plays down the
> Holocaust, whitewashes it or disguises its true magnitude.
Simultaneously,
> all facets of agitating incitement as well as embellished
discriminating
> disrespect are to be grasped (thus: BGHSt 46, pp. 36, 40). This
purpose of
> the law already clarifies that the mere fiddling with the number of
victims
> does not suffice to be counted as trivialising.
>
> If a relativising manner of expression is to be considered, then the
> significance of the contents of the complete statement of the
expression
> that are grasped through intelligent reading, are to be ascertained
through
> a textual analysis under consideration of all attendant
circumstances.
>
> A revisionist-agitating general message is not to be inferred from
Fritjof
> Meyer's text.
>
> Rather, Meyer clearly distances himself in his essay from every
attempt at
> trivialising the Holocaust and its horrors. Meyer explicitly states
in the
> last sentence of his essay - and thus in a textually particularly
prominent
> place:
>
> 'This conclusion does not relativise the barbarity, but verifies
it - a
> confirmed warning of a new break with civilisation.' In the light
of his
> calculations, Meyer explicitly describes the acts of violence
committed
> under National Socialist rule as 'verified barbarity' and a 'break
with
> civilisation'. This conclusion of Fritjof Meyer from the figures he
has
> calculated leaves no space, within the frame of the general view of
the
> contents that are given, for the opinion that Meyer wished to
express with
> his figures that 'things weren't so bad after all'. This
interpretation of
> the article of Fritjof Meyer - which you have obviously adopted -
perverts
> the message that the author wanted to bring across, and indeed
brought
> across. The article of Fritjof Meyer which you sent to numerous
members of
> the Bundestag does not fulfil the offence of incitement of the
People, alone
> due to legal reasons, which is why no punitive deed of
dissemination can be
> assumed, according to § 130 arts. 3, 4 and 2, no. 1a StGB, in the
multiple
> sending of this article."
>
> But what is then "obvious"? One is permitted to fiddle the figures -
on
> condition of the correct inner attitude. But what does this mean?
>
> "Obviousness" is an institute of the right of evidence. Where
evidence is
> concerned, it is a matter of facts - equally inner and outer facts.
>
> The Federal German supreme court considers the millionfold murder
of the
> Jews through poison gas to be an "obvious" fact. But if only
356.000 died in
> the gas, how do things look for the obviousness of the "genocide"?
>
> The path suggested by the prosecutor's office in Lüneburg is not
passable.
> It votes for the condition, that he who - politically correct -
> simultaneously defends himself against that his insights
be "abused" for a
> propaganda that rehabilitates the German People - which is
therefore branded
> as right-wing extremist -, is permitted to fiddle with the figure
of the
> victims. To bow down pro forma to political correctness is to
suffice.
> Whoever thinks so harebrained is permitted to deny or play down the
> Holocaust.
>
> For the others it counts as an "obvious fact" as before.
>
> The fact that it is - on top of things - also overseen that
the "Holocaust"
> is a value judgement and not a fact, is here mentioned in passing.
>
> Who has ever shaken hands with the Holocaust? Who has smelt it,
weighed it,
> or even seen it? Has anybody ever touched it?
>
> A historical fact is not a fact in the sense of the code of criminal
> procedure. Facts in the sense of the latter are perceptible changes
of the
> internal and external environment.
>
> If Chinese and Soviet soldiers engage in battles at the Ussuri and
many die
> through violence, then with the ascertainment of this fact, which is
> tangible from the viewpoint of criminal procedure, the question
remains
> whether this was just a border incident or the begin of a war
between Red
> China and the Soviet Union.
>
> If, at the same time as the events at the Ussuri, skirmishes had
taken place
> at other locations of the Soviet-Chinese border, then this would
also not be
> the equivalent of the ascertainment that a war had taken place
between the
> SU and Red China. Rather, these events could still be categorised
under the
> concept of "armed reconnaissance" (cf. Carl von Clausewitz). The
parties
> involved may just have followed the purpose of testing the
willingness and
> fitness for war of the other side, without intending to start a war.
>
> Only if divisions equipped for war had been put on standby in the
relevant
> area, and some of these had been led into a general conflict in
accordance
> with a military plan and under participation of all arms of the
services,
> only then would the historians be justified to infer, from the
observable
> facts, that a war had taken place between the SU and Red China.
>
> If 4 million Jews had indeed been gassed, then one would be
permitted to
> conclude that this was based on a plan of extermination by the Reich
> government.
>
> If however, only 100 or 1.000 or 10.000 Jews had been killed in
this manner,
> then one could not seriously speak of a planned extermination of
the Jewish
> people. If 100.000 or 350.000 murders through gas are up for
debate, and if
> circumstances are mentioned - as Meyer does (loc. cit. p. 633) -
which
> suggest a different motive for the killings than the "destruction
of the
> European Jews", namely considerations on checking the spread of
diseases,
> then the Holocaust theory is very questionable indeed. In November
1942
> Himmler ordered, under strictest secrecy, - according to Meyer -
to "gas"
> "all Jewish prisoners that are frail, ill or unfit for work" "in
order to
> prevent the spread of epidemics".
>
> If the reference, that Himmler himself withdrew this order "with a
bill"
> around the 27th of April 1943 - i.e. after 6 months - and decided
that in
> future only "mentally ill convicts" were to be killed, and that all
other -
> including the bedridden - convicts that are unfit to work are to be
excluded
> from the killings, and are to be given work "that they can also do
in bed",
> and that this order was "to be followed to the letter" (Meyer loc.
cit. p.
> 633, footnote 9 with reference to documents of the International
Military
> Tribunal - IMT - in Nuremberg), then the supposition of a planned
> "industrial" murder of the Jews with the aim of "the liberation of
Europe
> from the Jews" becomes unlikely.
>
> Furthermore: If the "millions" of victims have to be decreased by
millions,
> and only less than half a million remain for debate, then how do
things look
> for the evidence on which the thesis of the obviousness of
the "millionfold
> murder of the Jews" is based? They must have lied and falsified the
facts
> beyond belief.
>
> How has Fritjof Meyer "fiddled" the figure?
>
> He deletes the supposed main location of the murders through gas in
> Auschwitz, the mortuaries I and II: the attempts that had taken
place there
> had been failures "because the ventilators were counter-productive
and
> because in the following eleven months, the expected mass of
victims did not
> arrive." Immediately, the mass murders are relocated to two farm
houses
> which are situated outside the camp - of which nobody ever spoke
about
> before the mortuaries were found to have been unsuited. There is
nothing
> left to be seen of the farm houses. Their foundations have
only "recently"
> been discovered. The location and procedure of the crime must have
been
> wholly different than has always been claimed to be "obvious".
>
> After all, there are thousands of eyewitness statements which
declare with
> certainty, to have seen the crime in the mortuaries of the
crematoria I and
> II. The mass-killings were grotesquely recorded according to their
> statements: labour convicts who pulled the corpses of those who had
been
> killed in the gas out of the mortuaries of the crematoria I and II,
with
> their bare hands, topless, covered in sweat, without gas masks,
whilst
> smoking.
>
> Like almost all of the so-called revisionists, Meyer takes the laws
of
> physics and technical experiences into his considerations, in order
to show
> that the horrendous figures of numerous millions of dead through
gassings
> belong into the realm of fiction.
>
> The Dokumente der Verteidigung, due to which the affected was
sentenced,
> contain nothing other than this.
>
> What is now - after the power of the news magazine DER SPIEGEL,
which is to
> be assumed behind Meyer, has entered the arena with its extensive
archives -
> still "obvious" in the opinion of the High Jurists? What should,
what may, a
> timid person take to be the truth when the subject is
the "Holocaust"? How
> can Emily Yokel be helped, who reveals her naive mind to a judge
and thus
> possibly makes herself liable to prosecution:
>
>
> The Trial of Emily Yokel
> A tragic comedy by Ursula Haverbeck
>
>
> Emily Yokel reported herself, in connection with a criminal charge
which was
> brought against Rita Süßmuth and Fritjof Meyer by Horst Mahler for
> trivialising the Holocaust in an article which was published in the
magazine
> Osteuropa in May 2002, because of distribution of this article.
Here, now,
> are excerpts from the protocols of the four days of the trial.
>
> The first day of the trial
>
> Judge Core: Why did you report yourself?
> Accused: In order to make it possible for German judges to publicly
examine
> this question, which is a nightmare for the German People.
> Judge Core: We are not dealing with a question here, but with a
generally
> known, obvious fact.
> Accused: What does obvious mean in this case?
> Judge Core: That the matter no longer needs proof, since it is true
and
> unique.
> Accused: To which fact does this apply?
> Judge Core: In the National Socialist state, the German People
committed the
> greatest - i.e. unique - crime by gassing millions of Jews.
> Accused: You mean gassed with Zyklon B?
> Judge Core: Yes.
> Accused: What determines the uniqueness? This is just an indefinite
term.
> Judge Core: It is not at all indefinite. It means: mass murder by
use of the
> most modern technology.
> Accused: But was the guillotine not also the most modern technical
means for
> the mass killing of humans of its time? And what about the nuclear
bomb on
> Hiroshima? It too was the most modern development of weapons
technology and
> killed hundreds of thousands within seconds.
> Judge Core: Yes, but not six million.
> Accused: So it's the number of victims which is decisive? But
precisely this
> figure has been drastically reduced, especially in the last ten
years. It is
> no longer obvious. Please read the most recent publication of
Fritjof Meyer.
> Judge Core: I've read it. Meyer only ascertains a reduction of the
figure
> for Auschwitz. This does not mean that millions were not murdered
elsewhere.
> Accused: Oh, now I see what is meant. Could you please tell me
where these
> other locations are and what their names are? Up until now it was
always
> claimed that Auschwitz was the main scene of the crime - thus the
term
> "Auschwitz Lie" which is relevant to the courts. But this would
incorrect if
> you say that it was not Auschwitz. Where then?
> Judge Core: Today's hearing is finished.
>
> The second day of the trial
>
> Judge Core: Are you aware of the fact that, according to § 130
section 4
> StGB, denial of the Holocaust is punishable with up to three years
prison?
> Accused: Is it possible to deny something which did not take place?
> Judge Core: No, of course not. But the fact that its denial is
punishable,
> proves that the Holocaust must have taken place.
> Accused: Oh, I see. But this paragraph was passed only after
Auschwitz had
> also been thoroughly examined by chemists, and the story of the 4.5
million
> Jews gassed in these buildings was no longer credible. Fritjof
Meyer has
> just confirmed precisely this to be the truth. As such the location
is
> unknown.
> Judge Core: But this is not a matter of the location, but of the
facts.
> Accused: But a fact of such a gigantic extent, with 6 million dead,
needs a
> location in order to be provable as a fact, as an event.
> Judge Core: How can you deny this dreadful crime, for which there
are
> hundreds of witnesses? This is outrageous.
> Accused: I'm not denying anything. I just don't know where it took
place,
> after Fritjof Meyer - with the approval of Prof. Dr. Rita Süßmuth,
we may
> assume - proved that it was not Auschwitz. Currently, the scene of
the crime
> is unknown, and as such, obviousness is not given.
> Judge Core: You're neglecting the fact that there were many other
places:
> Majdanek, Treblinka, etc.
> Accused: But I know hardly anything about these. In public and in
the media,
> only the connection between Auschwitz and the Holocaust was always
> presented. Auschwitz was the place where the millions were gassed.
And
> that's now been proven to be wrong, to be a lie - the Auschwitz Lie.
> Judge Core: It is punishable to say this. And anyway, already
tomorrow new
> insights which refute Meyer could be available. Scientific
statements are
> seldom definite.
> Accused: This means that there is no obviousness, but at the most
> provisional insights? Is that what you mean?
> Judge Core: I don't mean anything, and hereby end the hearing.
>
> The third day of the trial
>
> Judge Core: Do you admit your guilt according to § 130 section 4 of
the
> Penal Code?
> Accused: I thought that I'd made myself guilty, by distributing this
> article, but following the previous two hearings, this seems
questionable to
> me.
> Judge Core: Why?
> Accused: Because it can hardly be considered guilt to serve the
finding of
> truth. And because it has become obvious that not only I, but
obviously you
> too, know very little about the scene of this enormous crime.
> Judge Core: I have, on numerous occasions, pointed out that it is
not a
> matter of the scene of the crime but of the fact of the Holocaust.
> Accused: That is correct, but you have not said how a Holocaust can
take
> place on this earth without a location. And in case a new location
is found,
> it will now also have to be carefully and extensively examined so
that a new
> mishap doesn't happen, and that it isn't again said: four million
Jews were
> here gassed, and a few years later it's only a couple of hundred
thousand.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
