Theos-Talk Archives (January 2004 Message tt00122)

The following extract is a description (from the standpoint of our visible 
physical universe of mass-energy) of a new, observationally proven scientific 
paradigm, indicating that electricity (not thermonuclear) is the fundamental 
force underlying all physical reality.  

When this concept (although still missing a few loose ends:-) is coupled with 
the seven subordinate "astro biological coenergetic" hyperspace fields (as 
postulated mathematically by Superstring/M-brane theory) -- that link the 
mass-energy fields with the empowering "superspin" or "spinergy" (near-infinite 
static electric charge due to angular momentum) of the coadunate zero-points of 
primal or absolute abstract space (which is everywhere), and is the root of 
consciousness (awareness-will) -- the all inclusive synthetic theory of ABCis the 
result.  

This all inclusive ABC theory -- since it explains, both ontologically and 
epistemologically, the nature and origin of both consciousness and matter as 
well as their interrelationships and interdependencies (although they are 
completely separate from each other by an insurmountable and ineffable gulf) -- will 
eventually be accepted by science as the fundamental "Theory of Everything."  
And, will, thereupon, completely vindicate -- in their eyes as well as the 
rest of the world -- all the teachings in the Secret Doctrine.

Thus, since electricity is the "force of LIFE," yet in itself nothing more 
than blind primordial "substance" -- we can each truly say, "I am (as the 
unchanging and eternal self-observer-witness) not my memory, my mind, my emotions, 
or my brain-body (which are forever changing)" -- or, "I am (a ray) of THAT, I 
AM (which is the Spirit of God -- the "Christos" or super consciousness and 
potential conscience of everything that lives)." 

So, as Rebbe Schnierson said, "Messiah (the savior) is here (in every one of 
us) ... If we only knew it." This is no different from what Krishna, Buddha, 
Jesus, HPB, and my friends named Phil said... And, now, I say.  

So, let's find out for ourselves who we each truly are, know what role we are 
currently playing, join with our brothers, and try to enjoy our trip through 
eternity together. </:-)>

Leonardo Hermes Maurer 

----------Extract------------------

From: http://www.holoscience.com/synopsis.php?page=11

"The machines that are first invented to perform any particular movement are 
always the most complex, and succeeding artists generally discover that with 
fewer wheels, with fewer principles of motion than had originally been 
employed, the same effects may be more easily produced. The first philosophical 
systems, in the same manner, are always the most complex." - Adam Smith. 

"The Electric Universe takes a simplifying leap by unifying the nuclear 
forces, magnetism and gravity as manifestations of a near instantaneous 
electrostatic force. Instead of being "spooked" by the concept of action-at-a-distance, 
like most physicists this century, the Electric Universe accepts it as an 
observational fact. Anyone who has tried to force two like poles of magnets 
together has demonstrated action-at-a-distance. "Electromagnetic" radiationis then 
simply the result of an oscillating electrostatic force.
 
At the level of the atom, the Electric Universe model takes a lead from the 
work of Ralph Sansbury, an independent New York researcher. Foremost is the 
simple recognition of the basic electrical nature of matter and the primacyof 
the electrostatic force** in matter interactions. It also rests upon the simple 
assumption that the proton, neutron and electron are composed of smaller 
charged particles, orbiting each other in a classical sense in stable, resonant 
orbits. That is, the energy exchanged between those sub-particles in elastic 
deformation during each orbit sums to zero. Being charged, the sub-particles 
interact via the electrostatic force. A simple calculation shows that the 
sub-particles that form an electron must travel at a speed far in excess ofthe speed 
of light - some 2.5 million light-years per second, or from here to the far 
side of the Andromeda galaxy in one second! So the electrostatic force mustact 
at a speed which is almost infinite on our scale for the electron to be stable. 
It is the stable orbital resonances of these sub-particles, both within and 
between particles that give rise to the phenomena of protons, neutrons, 
electrons and atoms. Other denizens of the particle "zoo" are merely transient 
resonant states of the same charged sub-particles. The so-called "creation"of 
matter from energetic photons is an illusion in which pre-existing matter is 
reorganized into new resonant states that give the impression that a particle has 
suddenly materialized. Antimatter is a misnomer since it too is formed fromthe 
same sub-particles as "normal" matter except that the total charge is 
mirrored. Matter cannot be created or annihilated.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

A Conventional View of Forces in Physics

1. Nuclear forces keep the nucleons (protons and neutrons) together in the 
atomic nucleus. They are the dominating forces in the nucleus, but of no 
importance at large distances from it. 

2a. Electric forces. A positive charge and negative charge attract each 
other, but similar charges repel. Electric forces keep the atoms together (" bind " 
the electrons to the nucleus). They are of a certain importance in the 
nucleus. At large distances electric forces are usually not so important because of 
a screening effect. For example, a positive charge attracts negative charges 
to its neighborhood so that they screen off the field from the positive charge.

2b. Magnetic forces are closely related to the electric forces. Because they 
cannot be screened very easily, they are efficient at larger distances than 
electric forces. Example: the Earth's magnetic field. 

3. Gravitation is much weaker than electric forces and therefore of no 
importance in the atom. As the gravitation cannot be screened, it is the dominating 
force at large distances. The orbits of the planets and the motions of stars 
and galaxies are ruled by gravitation." - H. Alfvén. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

Quantum Theory 

"For the first time the highly successful quantum theory gains a physical 
explanation in terms of resonant motion of charged particles, mediated by a 
near-instantaneous electrostatic force. A quantum electron orbit is one in which 
the exchange of energy between all of the sub-particles in the nucleus of an 
atom and those in an orbiting electron, sum to zero over the orbit. Exchange of 
energy takes the form of distortion of a particle to form an electrostatic 
dipole or a move to a new resonant orbit. 
 
Relativity Theory 

Einstein's Special Theory was designed to define simultaneity in a universe 
where the fastest force or signal was restricted to the measured speed of 
detection of light from a distant source. With an electrostatic force of 
near-infinite speed acting between the sub-particles of all matter, relativity theory 
reduces to classical physics. This leaves open the question of what we are 
measuring when we determine the speed of light. The speed of light in galactic 
terms is exceedingly slow, requiring about 150,000 years to cross our galaxy. 
However, the astronomer Halton Arp has shown that the redshifts of entire galaxies 
are quantized which requires some form of near instantaneous, galaxy-wide 
communication at the sub-atomic level. There are now several reported experiments 
that demonstrate faster than light effects. With the Special Theory gone, and 
the universe in communication with its parts effectively in real-time, there 
can be no time travel and space and time are independent. Common sense has 
always suggested that this was so. Einstein's General Theory was devised to 
explain gravity. It attempts to discard the observed action-at-a-distance of 
gravity by proposing a counter-intuitive warping of space in the presence of massive 
objects. This unnecessary complication of space is then added to the current 
metaphysical concepts of what constitutes the mass of an object. But space 
must also "warp" at near infinite speed to produce the observed planetary orbits. 
Common sense, observation, and parsimony of hypotheses all suggest that the 
electrostatic model of gravity (see below) is superior. There is now 
experimental evidence from gravity measurements at the time of a total solar eclipse 
that supports the Electric Universe model and discounts the General Relativity 
model. 

E = mc2 

Einstein's famous mathematical expression E=mc2, equating energy and massis 
known by almost everyone. However, most textbooks go on to use the word 
“matter” in place of “mass.” But nowhere has it been shown that mass and matter are 
interchangeable. In fact, we are entirely ignorant of what constitutes the 
mass of an object. So it is inadmissible to imply that energy and matter are 
interchangeable. The ultimate expression of this idea led to the nonsense of the 
big bang. It seems simpler and more sensible to suggest that both nuclear and 
chemical energy is released or absorbed by the rearrangement of the resonant 
orbits of charged particles. It is then common sense to suggest that mass is 
the measured response of a system of charged particles to an external 
electrostatic force. The more massive an object, the more the electrostaticforce 
contributes to the elastic deformation of its protons, neutrons and electrons, 
rather than their acceleration. This is the phenomenon seen in particle accelerators
and conventionally attributed to relativistic effects. But relativity 
reduces to classical physics in a universe where the electrostatic force has 
near-infinite speed. The first question to be asked is - if it is that simple, why 
hasn't it been thought of long ago? The answer seems to lie in the propensity 
for mathematical theory to supersede common sense and observation. There isalso 
a problem of language when mathematicians attempt to provide real meaning for 
their symbols."

http://www.holoscience.com/synopsis.php?page=12

The consequences and possibilities in an Electric Universe are far-reaching. 
First we must acknowledge our profound ignorance! We know nothing of the 
origin of the universe. There was no Big Bang. The visible universe is static and 
much smaller than we thought. We have no idea of the age or extent of the 
universe. We don't know the ultimate source of the electrical energy or matter that 
forms the universe. Galaxies are shaped by electrical forces and form plasma 
focuses at their centers, which periodically eject quasars and jets of 
electrons. Quasars evolve into companion galaxies. Galaxies form families with 
identifiable "parents" and "children". Stars are electrical “transformers” not 
thermonuclear devices. There are no neutron stars or Black Holes. We don't know 
the age of stars because the thermonuclear evolution theory does not apply to 
them. Supernovae are totally inadequate as a source of heavy elements. We do not 
know the age of the Earth because radioactive clocks can be upset by powerful 
electric discharges.

The powerful electric discharges that form a stellar photosphere create the 
heavy elements that appear in their spectra. Stars "give birth" electrically to 
companion stars and gas giant planets. Life is most likely to form inside the 
radiant plasma envelope of a brown dwarf star! Our Sun has gained new 
planets, including the Earth. That accounts for the “fruit-salad” of their 
characteristics. It is not the most hospitable place for life since small changes in 
the distant Sun could freeze or sterilize the Earth. Planetary surfaces and 
atmospheres are deposited during their birth from a larger body and during 
electrical encounters with other planets. Planetary surfaces bear the electrical 
scars of such cosmic events. The speed of light is not a barrier. Real-time 
communication over galactic distances may be possible. Therefore time is universal 
and time travel is impossible. Anti-gravity is possible. Space has no extra 
dimensions in which to warp or where parallel universes may exist. There isno 
"zero-point" vacuum energy. The invisible energy source in space is electrical. 
Clean nuclear power is available from resonant catalytic nuclear systems. 
Higher energy is available from resonant catalytic chemical systems than inthe 
usual chemical reactions. Biological enzymes are capable of utilizing resonant 
nuclear catalysis to transmute elements. Biological systems show evidence of 
communicating via resonant chemical systems, which may lend a physical 
explanation to the work of Rupert Sheldrake. DNA does not hold the key to life but is 
more like a blueprint for a set of components and tools in a factory. We may 
never be able to read the human genome and tell whether it represents a creature 
with two legs or six because the information that controls the assembly line 
is external to the DNA. There is more to life than chemistry.

We are not hopelessly isolated in time and space on a tiny rock, orbiting an 
insignificant star in an insignificant galaxy. We are hopefully connected with 
the power and intelligence of the universe.

The future in an Electric Universe looks very exciting indeed!