Theos-Talk Archives (January 2004 Message tt00383)

Hi dear
I gess not.
Although she didnīt know, her Masters were her chelas, not the opposite.
In her " lower mind", or in her " incarnated ego" ( to stabilish a difference) she was unaware of this, but the masters unly used her to express not only the secret dharmas but also her own knowledge, brought to her under the veils of her vigil inconscience, through the " amanuensis role ".
She could read entire works and books which her chelas and assistants showed her in the astral light.
In the cosmic plane she is still a special divinity and at that period it was not different.
She was much, much more than it is registered in anything ever written.
Can you please locate this Dallas article?
Sometimes I cannot read them through then I save them for later reading andend up forgeting...
Best regards

Krishtar
----- Original Message ----- 
From: christinaleestemaker 
To: krishtar_a@brturbo.com 
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 5:55 PM
Subject: Why Blavatsky


A very good question.
I think in that time she was the only one to find so crazy to be 
manipulated and use all the lifetime to write what they dictated; why 
self enjoying meditation on the Divine.
I think Dallis sent a whole story about this and We need one week to 
read.
Greetings Christina



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]