Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00508)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Bart Lidofsky <bartl@s...> wrote:
> Morten Nymann Olesen wrote:
> > * Creation is an incorrect word to use, as no religion, not even 
the
> > sect of the Visishta Adwaitees in India -- one which
> > anthropomorphises even Parabrahmam -- believes in creation out of
> > nihil as Christians and Jews do, but in evolution out of 
preexisting
> > materials.
> 
> Which means that Blavatsky clearly didn't do her research. 
The Jews do 
> not believe in "creation out of nihil"; read the first chapter of 
> Genesis; Creation is clearly described as taking undifferentiated 
> substance and turning it into differentiated substance.
> 
> Bart

Hey Bart, I'm back from dancing in the sands off the ocean.

Creation was THE WORD. There is no substance in the Word. The Word 
was made flesh, etc.. This is also the tie that theoretical and 
experimental physicists are so excited about. They are making this 
connection to the "Big Bang." This is what has them shocked that 
dark matter is greater in the universe, more powerful and more 
important than "light." Light is a created matter. But out of what? 

The WORD is the source of all creation. I think that is what I or 
HPB if you will, meant by "out of nihil."

Netemara