Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00534)

Was not it that Steiner was against the preparing of a World Teacher 
and why?
For Bailey should have other reasons.
I think all of them have nothing to do with altruism! And that is 
what Blavatsky presents.
Christina










--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, James <jamesfox@a...> wrote:
> At 19:23 22/03/04 +0000, you wrote:
> >--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "christinaleestemaker"
> ><christinaleestemaker@y...> wrote:
> >
> > > and also fearlessly to exercise his own
> > > right of liberty of thought and of expression there of, within 
the
> > > limits of courtesy and consideration for others.
> >
> >Thank you, Christina, for you comments. Do anti-Semitic remarks, on
> >this list or anywhere, fall under this category, i.e., "courtesy 
and
> >consideration for others"?
> >
> >I maintain that any attack against any ethnic, national or social
> >group of the human family is against the very spirit of Theosophy.
> >
> >Pedro
> >
> Of course it is, but what is of interest here to me is your next 
step where 
> you want to exclude the "attacker". It is just this sort of rigid 
> moralising coupled with a punishing attitude that lead to the 
separation 
> from the TS of such people as Judge, Steiner and Bailey.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >