Theos-Talk Archives (April 2004 Message tt00094)

Steve Stubbs wrote the following on Olcott's
testimony about meeting the Masters:

". . . the only proof we can have of the masters'
historical existence is testimony from a qualified
witness, and we have that from Olcott. . . . Olcott's
testimony is sufficient in my judgment to establish
their corporeal existence as legal persons. . . . I
cannot agree with anyone that they were fictions,
fantasies, imagined beings, trance personalities, or
any such thing as that unless the Olcott evidence can
be satisfactorily disposed of. I raised that question
some time ago, and no one has ever addressed it, so
for that reason I remain stubbornly convinced that the
mahatmas were real men as they were claimed to be." 

Quoted from:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/5195

Steve, I wonder if you are still of this opinion
or if you have changed your mind?

Daniel