Theos-Talk Archives (May 2004 Message tt00020)

leonmaurer@aol.com wrote:
> it was based on. With regard to the information about Einstein's connection 
> with the Secret Doctrine -- which, in fact, triggered the initial question about 
> Cranston's reliability -- I think there is enough first hand knowledge and 
> documentation to give it credence beyond any shadow of a doubt.
OK. I think that, "somebody told somebody else that they saw a book, 
and nobody knows where the book is." counts as sketchy evidence, you 
think it counts as evidence beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Bart