Theos-Talk Archives (May 2004 Message tt00128)

Thanks Leon,

But I have just posted some websites on ttt today about the latest 
updates. I have found total physical vindication for the new 
or "new" stuff I will be synthesizing in the work I am doing now.

It is truly exciting to know finally what the experiences of "going 
inside" really represents and the impact it will have on future 
scientific research. We will be using light in the future as easily 
as we use other things in nature.

Netemara


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, leonmaurer@a... wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 05/04/04 11:58:35 AM, netemara888@y... writes:
> 
> (snip -- see below)
> 
> >I believe that knowledge is universal being held for humanity in 
the 
> >form of light waves or strings and that the plant kingdom 
(according 
> >to AAB) is also the holder of the akhasic records.
> 
> Then (unless she is being misinterpreted) AAB (who was parroting 
Leadbeater) 
> didn't know what the Akasha really is, or has it all mixed up 
(like almost 
> everything else they said about the true nature of reality as 
given out by HPB) 
> -- since the Akashic record is everywhere that any matter (visible 
or 
> invisible) is, but is not any part of that matter. 
> 
> Although, we could say that the plant kingdom is a "holder" of the 
Akashic 
> records in a partial sense -- since, in essence the Akasha and its 
record is 
> also wherever the genetic model is encoded within every zero-point 
of manifest 
> geometric space... Although, this genetic "knowledge" or 
informational coding 
> for different forms of life can only be expressed through the 
progressive 
> degrees of evolutionary organization of the DNA molecules (and 
their coenergetic 
> field configurations) -- that are the basis of all organic or 
inorganic "life" 
> (or potential consciousness) in all kingdoms of manifest nature 
from mineral, 
> through plant, to mankind (and, of course, "Angels" or Chohans :-
). 
> 
> Therefore, the "strings" of primal energy that manifests in all 
those 
> kingdoms of nature, are "Maya" and only temporary, since "light 
waves" appear only in 
> the worlds of cosmic substance or multidimensional space... While 
the Akashic 
> record is encoded in the eternal circling of the non dimensional 
zero-point 
> instant spin momentum or "spinergy" surrounding the zero-point of 
primal space 
> ("THE ETERNAL PARENT (Space), WRAPPED IN HER EVER INVISIBLE 
ROBES") -- that is 
> "everywhere" beyond, yet within, all manifest (multi dimensional) 
space and 
> time. 
> 
> Strings, as Mayavic emanations, can only decay as the Universe 
ages, but the 
> information they carry as vibrational patterns of manifest force 
or 
> mass-energy, when not dissipated or contradicted by counter 
intelligence on the higher 
> Buddhi-Manas planes, transfers (coenergetically) from and to the 
different 
> levels of pure circular spin in the non manifest Akashic realm -- 
that continues 
> through infinite duration, from Manvantara to Manvantara, without 
change or 
> diminishment. This Akasha, then, holds on its wings, so to speak, 
the eternal 
> record of all relative changes experienced on the manifest planes. 
Thus Krishna, 
> representing the rootless root of the Akasha, can say, "I 
established this 
> whole universe with a single portion of myself, and remain 
separate 
> (undiminished)." This is the fundamental basis of relativity as 
well as quantum 
> divisibility. 
> 
> Incidentally, Einstein could have considered all this, but no 
previous 
> scientific knowledge based on Newtonian laws of mechanics he 
learned as a physicist 
> could anticipate it -- as Richard Feynman pointed out. (see: 
> 
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/einstein.html
) 
> Therefore, his E=mc^2 as well as his concept of relativity with 
respect to 
> inertia was a pure intuitive insight that could only have come 
about from his 
> study of the previous esoteric metaphysics exposed fully for the 
first time to 
> the West in the Secret Doctrine (a book we have heard was probably 
given to him 
> by his friend Robert Millikan, a Mason and theosophist, several 
years before 
> he wrote his first paper on special relativity in 1905). Once he 
had that 
> equivalency relationship between mass and energy "modulated by the 
velocity of 
> light in the vacuum, which is a function of both frequency and 
time (implied if 
> not explained thoroughly in the SD) along with the concept 
of "elements" as 
> individual quanta (also presaged in the SD) -- he had to invent 
the tensor 
> (vector) mathematics that defined the 4-dimensionally curved space-
time continuum 
> that led to the general theory of relativity. Unfortunately, 
stymied by the 
> discrepancies between relativity and quantum physics, he never 
considered 
> vibrating "strings" as the intermediary between the quantum 
particle and the 
> zero-point spinergy (or Akasha) and, therefore, failed in his 
quest to formulate a 
> unified field theory -- which today's Superstring/M-brane theory 
has almost 
> achieved. (The only thing still left out is the final link to 
consciousness or 
> perception -- that, if they know where to look, is also thoroughly 
covered in 
> the SD.:-) See: 
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics 
> 
> Thus, the Akashic record has nothing directly to do with 
the "strings" of 
> manifest light or primal energy -- other than endowing them with 
the information 
> that causes their vibrational patterns to take on the various 
forms of 
> fundamental particles -- the forces of which ultimately correlate 
and evolve into the 
> atomic, molecular, and subsequent organic forms of nature 
(also "informed" by 
> the "Akashic record," or primal, pre Cosmic intelligence).
> 
> Leonardo
> 
> 
> --------------------Original message-----------
> 
> >--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "stevestubbs" 
<stevestubbs@y... wrote:
> >
> >> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "netemara888" 
<netemara888@y... 
> >> wrote:
> >> > I am not a scholar of Einstein but I did read that huge 
biography 
> >> > about him and the thing that gives credence to his 
beininfluenced 
> >> > or impressed by something outside of himself is that he came 
up
> >> > with the theory of special relativity purely by putting 
himself in the 
> >> > place in his mental dimension.
> >> 
> >> You are right that this is a commonly received story. It is 
easily 
> >> shown, however, that many of the ideas in Einstein's theory 
were 
> >> already known before he wrote his first paper and that he 
synthesized 
> >> them into something which came to more than the sum of its 
parts. 
> >>So the story that he merely visualized himself in an elevator 
car in 
> >> outer space does not tell the whole story.
> >
> >Steve,
> >
> >That's exactly right. And what we all need to remember is that 
> >physicists nor other scientists work in a vacuum. I am working or 
> >rather rewriting what I started some time ago. In it I hope to 
show 
> >why there is no such thing as an unthought thought or a new 
concept. 
> >People choose knowledge probably according to the vibrations that 
> >come to them that are similar. People always say that they are on 
the 
> >same wavelength. In fact this could be a fact. That we operate by 
> >registering wavelengths or string vibrations. 
> >
> >I believe that knowledge is universal being held for humanity in 
the 
> >form of light waves or strings and that the plant kingdom 
(according 
> >to AAB) is also the holder of the akhasic records.
> >
> >Netemara