Theos-Talk Archives (June 2004 Message tt00140)

Seems to me that "sense making" in 
various senses could be seen as a kind 
of monadizing or unifying activity or 
approach inasmuch as it's seen in the 
sense of an interpretive activity with 
the objective of creating "workable 
models" as if they could be 
"sufficiently defined within whatever 
reality/truth parameters" as if notions 
about Maya were irrelevant during such 
defining, life making, worldview making, 
sense making, as if such 
theoretics/worldviews amounted to real 
or "real enough" shell-like modules. 
I'm not saying that such 
worldview-making doesn't amount to or 
involve something "real enough" (ie, 
"obviously enough I'm here," still 
worldviewing/speculating, aren't I ... 
^:-/ ...), but seems to me that belief 
structures on this planet, in general, 
might be seen in terms of representing 
"karmic/mayavic" shell-like/protective 
structures (or "monadics," in a sense) 
and reifications that Theosophy might 
define as "karmic," and so seems to me 
that what's known as as a human tendency 
to "worldview" or "make sense" (per 
whatever interpretive tendency) might be 
alternately seen/interpreted as being 
(somewhat interestingly ...) allied to 
the apparent 
(exoteric/mayavic/pluralistic/misleading) 
"monads" of Theosophy---though "monad," 
by definition, is supposed to be 
Unitary, isn't it, to begin with, so ... 
^:-/ ...

Speculatively,
Mauri

samblo@cs.com wrote:
> Mauri,
> Stay away from beaches, they have too many "shells" on them.
>
> John
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links