Theos-Talk Archives (July 2004 Message tt00119)

In a message dated 07/03/04 11:45:58 AM, danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com writes:

(snip)

>So was this letter from K.H. merely an "illusion of
>solidity" as Leon might say or palmed off on Olcott
>by the Master Koot Hoomi as Bart might believe? 

Where and when did Leon say that all letters received as so called "Mahatma 
Letters" had to be "illusions of solidity"? And, why "might" he say it in this 
case? 

Besides, how can we be sure this whole thing is not a cooked up story and the 
letter a forgery? In fact, how do we know that "Koot Hoomi" isn't a figment 
of someone's imagination, or a fictitious name that could fit any number of 
self professed or alleged Masters, or an actor playing a role? Or, that Olcott 
was awakened after a party, still had a hangover (maybe from a few puffs from 
a Hashish hookah) and imagined the letter wasn't in his hand before he woke up 
and felt it. Get real Daniel... Testimonial evidence isn't "proof" of 
anything.

Maybe you had better stop this personal badgering with your innuendoes and 
slyly worded implications, before you really put your foot in your mouth -- and 
prove to all of us that you are one big clown, who can't stand anyone 
disagreeing with his blind belief in anything anyone connected with fundamental 
theosophy says -- and will never stop his vendetta-like bombardment of supposedly 
authoritative quotes -- until all those heretics who take all of theosophy with 
a grain or salt (until they prove it for themselves) grovel in the dust and 
admit their errors. </:-)>

>Was KH ALSO prone to play jokes on people too??!!

How could anyone know that? And what kind of dumb question is this? Who 
said that anyone else was "prone" to play tricks on people? And if anyone did, 
who did, about what person? And, what does Koot Hoomi have to do with it?

LHM