Theos-Talk Archives (July 2004 Message tt00448)

What, exactly is wrong with the "back to Blavatsky" movement? She is our source and security from "neo-Theosophist" wanderings, and CWL's glorification of masturbation as the correct way to approach the Masters. I'll be damned if I will forsake HPB for the imaginations of "neo-Theosophists" of any stripe. I'll admit that I am somewhat intoxicated (I love American bourbon), but I am still not convinced that AB and CWL had any more to do with our spirituality than those who sought to find our foundation on the founder, Herself. Please forgive me for my blatant message (post), but I love the "old lady" more than anyone can imagine. She was a user of hashish and yet taught us all that we needed to know in this cycle. Please correct me if I am wrong, but "back to Blavastsky" seems to be the way back to the Masters and to real knowledge. I will sober up later, but I mean what I say. "In vino veritas". Hpb is unparalelled in Theosophical or any history. May the gods help us if we reject her in favor of "neo-Theosophy" or other such perversions. Sincerely,

Andrew W. Smith, M.A.(English),F.T.S.
Master Sergeant, USA/USAF (Ret.)
www.theosociety.org<http://www.theosociety.org/>
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind. -- Emerson, "Self-Reliance"

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]