Theos-Talk Archives (September 2004 Message tt00110)

Pedro,

In your post at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/18456

in answer to my series of questions about whether
Besant and Leadbeater followed the advice in the
1900 KH letter, you "reply":

"Are you following the advice given in the letter 
to Besant in postings like the one above?"

Oh, I see. Turn the tables around....

But last time I checked I was not claiming
to be the mouthpiece of the Mahatmas.

And as far as I know I am not
"on the threshold of divinity."

And I have not said that 

"I HAVE STOOD. . . IN THE PRESENCE OF THE SUPREME DIRECTOR
OF EVOLUTION ON THIS GLOBE."

And as far as I know I am not one of the
twelve apostles or an arhat.

But since Mrs. Besant and Mr. Leadbeater
claimed such an exalted status for themselves
I think it is quite relevant to ask
whether THEY followed the said advice of 
Master KH.

Heck I'm just a mere fallible mortal....

Daniel





--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "prmoliveira" <prmoliveira@y...> 
wrote:
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel H. Caldwell" 
> <danielhcaldwell@y...> wrote:
> 
> > So I ask you Pedro and other interested readers,
> > since this letter was written to Mrs. Besant,
> > did she and her colleague Mr. Leadbeater
> > in the years after 1900 follow this
> > advice of the Master?
> > 
> > Or did they ignore the advice and 
> > in fact help to raise up "a confused
> > aura" that hindered the Masters' work?
> > 
> > For example, did Mr. Leadbeater's book THE
> > MASTERS AND THE PATH go counter to the Master 
> > KH's advice?
> > 
> > Or did Mrs. Besant's talk about the 
> > the Lord Maitreya [
> > see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/18427 ]
> > run contary to the Master's advice in 1900?
> > 
> > Furthermore, did all the talk about the 
> > the Lord Maitreya, Krishnaji as the vehicle
> > of the Lord, the 12 apostles, etc. also 
> > run contary to the advice of KH:
> > 
> > "Let the devotion and service 
> > be to that Supreme Spirit alone of which each
> > one is a part."
> 
> > 
> Regarding your questions, let those who are interested judge for 
> themselves. 
> 
> 
> Pedro