Theos-Talk Archives (September 2004 Message tt00667)

Anand,

You wrote:

"Infallibility is not possible on this 
planet even for Masters, HPB was far too 
away from infallibility. Masters have clearly 
written this. So I don't want to repeat same point.

Was the above in reply to my posting:

Anand on Blavatsky's "mistakes"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/19039

If so, "infallibility" was not really the topic
of my posting. 

Let me refresh your memory.

The main question was:

"Anand, I would like to know why you think HPB using
the word 'authority' or 'authoritative' was a
mistake? Why was it a 'mistake'?
And how do you know it was a mistake?
Maybe it was NOT a 'mistake'. Have you ever considered
that?"

Another question was . . . . 

Did HPB make a mistake when she wrote:

"...neither Mars nor Mercury belong to our chain. They are, along
with the other planets, septenary Units in the great host of 'chains'
of our system, and all are as visible as their upper globes are
invisible. . . ."

And if you think HPB was wrong about this, why do think
so?

I repeat:

Anand, I am trying to understand your point of view and thinking on
this matter and how you are arriving at such conclusions.

Daniel
http://blavatskystudycenter.com