theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat

Oct 04, 2004 01:34 PM
by Anand Gholap


Criticizing respected author of other organization is as wrong as 
christion criticizing Buddha or buddhist criticizing Christ. Are 
discussion groups formed to discuss principles of Theosophy or 
criticizing leaders of other organizations.
Anand Gholap


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten N. Olesen" <global-
theosophy@a...> wrote:
> My views are:
> 
> Well...
> 
> I will have to ask you politely and wellmeaning:
> Is it not also a question about whether one
> actually "see bad in authors out of proportion" or Not ?
> 
> How much bad is allowed from any author of wellknown theosophical 
admiration
> before - enough is enough?
> Is there no limit?
> And if there is a limit, where do you Anand think it is?
> And who decides this?
> 
> from
> M. Sufilight
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@A...>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > That's right. Especially when all so called Theosophical Societies
> > have main object Universal Brotherhood and when members see bad in
> > authors out of proportion, then something is wrong.
> > Fraternally,
> > Anand Gholap
> >
> >
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "clarity12.1@j..."
> > <clarity12.1@j...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What would it take to drop politics from the very word 
theosophy.
> > it has so much baggage, that the word itself, detracts even more 
that
> > it might attract. How much time do we take in addressing the very
> > long file of ts players. Does this practice not keep us off the 
task
> > of practicing the principles we seem to more or less agree that 
exist-
> > -self existent.
> > >
> > > If we only concentrate on the pure principles, without the 
relative
> > bias interference, then would we not be practicing a form of
> > meditation, I call conscious communication? Language that 
divides,
> > regardless of it's astute intelluectual power, is still a breach 
of
> > the so called oneness that we essentially are.
> > > Or is this view naive?
> > >
> > > Regina
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your name as your email address.
> > > Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
> > > Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >






[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application