Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00199)

Do you mean that we have to stop thinking about it as a THING? So only Absolute can know Absolute, something outside of it cannot know it? But my linear thinking is that the Absolute, somehow, knows that it knows, because we are the multitudineous parts of it? We will always be relative to it, but it will be absolute in itself because of the relativeness outside of itself?
Cass

leonmaurer@aol.com wrote:

Right. There is no such THING as THE Absolute. So how can we talk about it 
viewing or being viewed?

In a message dated 01/09/05 12:32:51 AM, silva_cass@yahoo.com writes:

Perhaps the only thing that is Absolute, is THAT beyond the zero point. 
PRALAYA?


Zakk Duffany wrote:


The Absolute is Relative when viewed by the Relative.

The Relative is Absolute when viewed by the Absolute.


Perspectives change with the standpoint of viewing.


----- Original Message ----- 

From: 

To: 

Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:48 PM

Subject: Re: Theos-World A Question for the New Year





In a message dated 01/08/05 3:38:29 PM, krishtar_a@brturbo.com writes:


>If the absolute evolves. it is not absolute.

>The absolute cannot evolve, or itīd be relative, and when there is

relativeness,

>we are not dealing with the absolute anymore.(qwack!)

>

>Krishtar


But, "The Absolute is Relative, and the Relative is Absolute." Didn't you

know that? It comes straught from the mouth of the Buddha, and was verified

later by HPB.


Leonardo

>



Yahoo! Groups Links








__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]