Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00299)

Mauri,

I did not write the statement "Absolute statements are
always wrong."

That was submitted by another on a reply to one of
my correspondences. 
I pesonally do not see matters from the "right or wrong"
frame of mind.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mauri" <mhart@idirect.ca>
To: "theos-talk" <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World A Question for the New Year


> Zakk wrote:
>
> <<Absolute statements are always wrong.>>
>
> While conditionality might be seen to 
> have a mayavic aspect, how could humans 
> in general live in and 
> experience/interpret their conditional 
> world/reality without having the kind of 
> worldview in which there's "enough" (per 
> whatever interpretive tendency) solidity 
> and dependability (where that kind of 
> interpretive "enough" might even tend to 
> make for some sort of "absoluteness," 
> maybe, in some cases, for better or 
> worse ...)that would at least appear 
> "real enough" in the sense in which we 
> humans generally accept/define our world 
> and life in general ...
>
> Seems to me that, in a conditional 
> world, all statements have an 
> exoteric/conditional interpretive/karmic 
> aspect (obviously enough ...). Of course 
> that doesn't stop some people (like 
> students of Theosophy, one might assume 
> ...) from speculating and intuiting or 
> directly experiencing beyond the various 
> apparent/exoteric/interpretive versions 
> of statements/thoughts in general 
> (resulting in modified exoteric 
> versions, modified universe modeling or 
> whatever, in some cases) ...
>
> Speculatively,
> Mauri
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links