Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00659)

Perry Coles wrote:
> If the reason Bailey material is not promoted is in order to avoid 
> takeovers I can understand that but I would say if a knowledge of the 
> historical reasons was more widely known by the membership it is able 
> to help lectern any animosity that may arise from this issue.
There's lots of information that's not promoted. Anon Lavey's Satanic 
Bible is not, nor is the Book of Mormon, the books of Gerald Gardner, 
nor, for that matter, the liturgy of the Liberal Catholic Church. Bailey 
moves from philosophy into religion, albeit a theosophically based one, 
and, as such, is worthy of study, but not promotion.

Bart