Theos-Talk Archives (February 2005 Message tt00582)

Daniel, you write about "Holocaust Denial".

Could you explain what that means exactly?
Have you a special theosophical interpretation or 
do you follow the Zionist rhetoric?

I mean that do my logic (its but Aryan, admitted) 
denial means to say that something did not happen 
which in fact did happen.
To deny something therefore (to me) is the second 
step. The first step to have a knowledge of that 
what is denied.
Ernst Zundel, who is a true beleiver in karma in 
reincanration according to his own words to German 
Theosophists, has not found any positive evidence 
that the Holocaust happened.
How can anyone who has not found in a strong 
scientific way (eywitness, photos, plans, orders, 
documents, chemical analysis) deny it?

One can only proof that something happened, one 
cannot proof that something did not happen.

Many upright Jews as David Irving, J. G. Burg or 
Raphael Seligmann (in his new Hitler biography) 
are of course not to be regarded as "deniers", 
don't?
Or do you think they lie? They just have no 
positive evidence for it.

Since years I find it strange that obviously the 
Adyar people use the words as the Point Loma 
people, but give them a different meaning.

It seems that Adyar people give terms like deny, 
Master, messenger, freedom, brotherhood, race a 
meaning quite different from that what HPB meant.

Frank