Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00198)

Mauri,
No, it was not remote viewing, the individual was in a state of altered 
consciousness with the context that his personality is stepped aside while 
another utilized his body mechanisms to deliver speech or write content. While in 
the projection state his eyeballs are rolled up so that one cannot see any of 
the iris of the eye, only the white of the eye is seen. not withstanding this 
delimiting of vision he draws and writes with precision of a draftsman. There 
were over 400 hours of audio tape recordings as also 5000 ft. of professional 
movie film taken in color on a Clair Movie Camera and many rolls of 35mm color 
photo's. James E. Frazier entered into a life-rights agreement with the 
experiencer back in 1975 and has all the original archival proofs. It is a very 
involved complex overall process that is contained of several distinct phase 
periods in this persons life from age 16 to 33 years and still ongoing today 27 
years later. In a very loose way "remote" could also be the use of another 
alternate persona as a remote source to deliver a communication. But it is not his 
normative conscious personality that is producing the content as he has no 
known knowledge base from which he has had exposure or memory to produce the 
content. Nothing wrong with speculating, I have done that a lot in regard to his 
case.

John




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]