Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00221)

Mar 13 2005

Thanks Lenny,

All noted with thanks.

Also thanks for reference to Sci. Amer. On "Big Bang." 

====================================

In my understanding, Lenny, at NO TIME is there ever a complete pralaya.  

I say this, since logically (to me) the universe is infinite -- hence this
alternation, as posited, cannot be reduced to any kind of time-space period,
or succession, or cycle except as might be generated by us because of our
present finitely defined imagination -- a kind of materialism in thought
that is self-limiting.  

Getting out of that trap is important. THEOSOPHY helps.

There is inevitably a conjoint existence. Manifestation and
non-manifestation are intertwined (as in the CADUCEUS symbol), there are
two serpents overshadowed by the THIRD which is NOT CYCLICAL but wholly
straight -- a balance median or a background. 

This does not obviate the ABSOLUTE as an eternal, inscrutable, essential and
basic SOURCE or "BACKGROUND." 


Best wishes, 

Dallas
 
===============================

-----Original Message-----
From: leonmaurer@aol.com [mailto:leonmaurer@aol.com] 
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 3:18 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Theos-World Re: Weekly Review: Misconceptions about the Big Bang


Maybe the below article will show us why science, so long as it bases it's 
theoretical conclusions regarding the nature of reality on observed physical

phenomena, will never comprehend the theosophical metaphysics (as symbolized
by the ABC model in line with the description of Cosmogenesis in the SD) 
explaining the fundamental condition of primal space prior to the "Big Bang"
that 
initiated *only* this lowest "physical" phase of Cosmic involution.  

They fail to consider that prior to that apparent "beginning" there must
have 
been an emanation (inflation), and fractal *involution -- followed, 
afterward, by a spiritual, astral and physical *evolution* in time... All
this having 
occurred in accord with the cyclic laws inherent in *this* Cosmos' "laya
Point" 
(its zero-point spinergy or G-force) which is everywhere, eternally existent

in Absolute Space.  

In this view, it should be noted that the expansion of the lower physical 
sphere of space -- which is involved as the fourth level of fractal
involution 
(like bubbles within bubbles, within bubbles, etc.) -- analogously follows
the 
overall infinite expansion of the outermost surrounding spiritual field
("Ring 
Pass Not"). It follows, that the expansion of the lower order physical
space 
time continuum that science measures is finite... And, ultimately, must 
disappear into the Cosmic laya point when the outer field returns to its
source -- 
without violating any of the fundamental scientific laws of symmetry, 
conservation, thermodynamics, or entropy.  

Unfortunately, IMO, the below scientific explanation adds considerably to
the 
misconceptions.

LHM
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics

http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html

http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif


In a message dated 03/08/05 4:03:57 PM, newsletters@reply.sciam.com writes:

** Misconceptions about the Big Bang

from SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 

The expansion of the universe may be the most important fact we 
have ever discovered about our origins. 


Cold molecular things such as life-forms and terrestrial planets could not
have come into existence unless the universe, starting from a hot big bang,
had 
expanded and cooled. 


Forty years ago this July, scientists 
announced the discovery of definitive evidence for the expansion 
of the universe from a hotter, denser, primordial state. They had 
found the cool afterglow of the big bang: the cosmic microwave 
background radiation. 


Since this discovery, the expansion and cooling of the universe has been the
unifying theme of cosmology, much as Darwinian evolution is the unifying
theme of biology, but many misconceptions still persist. 

http://cl.exct.net/?ffcd16-fe5e15757363027e7717-fe23167073670c7b7c1678