Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00430)

In a message dated 03/17/05 2:22:19 PM, AnandGholap@AnandGholap.org writes:

>
>Are members criticizing revered leaders under sweet name of 
>philosophizing.

Revered to whom? Members of what? What's wrong with disagreeing with the 
ideas, philosophies or actions of anyone -- including all supposed "leaders" of 
any group, religious, political or philosophical -- whether dead or alive? 
What makes such so called "leaders" sacrosanct to anyone other than their 
sycophants? Especially, if they might be leading their group down a wrong path.

However, in my view those disagreements or criticisms should be directed to 
their teachings and their ideas only -- and not to their personal lives -- as 
that is strictly their own business, and doesn't warrant any discussion in any 
theosophically minded group. 

Leon....