theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

One of Paul Johnson's Arguments About Olcott's Testimony on the Masters

Apr 07, 2005 10:17 AM
by Daniel H. Caldwell


Paul Johnson wrote:

"It is far more feasible to follow known people 
making documented journeys to known locations by 
known means than to follow unknown persons making 
undocumented journeys by unknown means which are 
allegedly miraculous in some cases."

Johnson's argument here is fallacious and the 
two categories of evidence he poses are artificial 
and really don't hold up to close scrutiny. 

For more details, see:

http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonparanormal3.htm#II

Daniel
Blavatsky Study Center
http://blavatskystudycenter.org









 

[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application