Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt01155)

To all,

So now we hear not only that theos-talk is being dictated to as what subjects 
it can talk about, and in the next breath, that it should not be doing what 
its name implies -- by slickly trying to make us believe that Blavatsky was not 
a true theosophist (as isn't anyone who studies her teachings) and that only 
Leadbeater can be the new guru of the Theosophical Movement we should all 
listen to and worship. 

Taking this together with all the other one liners this duck spouts 
(including the subject lines he uses) that are left handed propaganda and proselytizing 
of another organized religion which he'd like to keep calling "theosophical" 
-- with Leadbeater as its first ordained Pope -- who does he think he's 
fooling?

Sure, serious students of Blavatsky or the SD will find the Leadbeater group 
difficult to get along with... Since they are the only ones who know how 
cleverly CWL had distorted the Master's teaching of theosophy and occultism -- so 
as, we might suppose, to fool the gullible converts to the religion he founded 
into believing that the Masters of theosophy approve what he twisted it into, 
and that his writings should be their Bible. I wonder whether this slick 
propaganda set up is nothing more than politicking to become the new pope of the 
LCC, and that we are being drummed up as a core of his new congregations 
outside of its root in India? Caveat Emptor.

LHM 

Anand Gholap <AnandGholap@AnandGholap.org> wrote:


Christina,

Our conversation many times does not remain limited to Theosophy and 

this group is on Theosophy. So Eldon and others may not like people 

talking on subjects unrelated to Theosophy. If you want we can talk 

at Leadbeater group. Others who want to talk more freely on other 

subjects may also join. For Theosophy Theos-talk is better for other 

subjects Leadbeater group. Blavatskians will find it difficult in 

that group. 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Leadbeater


Anand Gholap