Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt01406)

Hallo John and all,

My views are:

Apart from the below I do not find any disagreement in our views.

John wrote:
"I just disagree with your perception that it
is okay for you to judge that a particular writing is wrong for me."

Well...John I didn't do that.
Perhaps you perceived my email in such a manner.
But, let us be honest - I did NOT judge
what is right or wrong for you.

I just said, what I thought.

I said:
"But if the truth is, that - if - you are saying
HPB is right and "to be a child-molester is wrong".
"To be a child-molester is right" and HPB is wrong - I would say that I
certainly DO NOT find that amusing !!!"

Is that to be judging you?

John wrote:
"Please note that the purpose of my response is NOT to compare HPB and
CWL. Put any two names into this document, and my comparisons are still
valid."


I do not find that view valid or amusing at all.
Let me put it like this.
X is more clever than Y and this is a fact.
It will not work the other way around Y is more clever than X.
Because that is a lie.

What you in fact are saying is that our talk about who is right or wrong is 
amusing.
I think it is serious.

But i get you point, that it is sort of silly
to discuss whether X is right and Y is wrong - OR - whether Y is right and X 
is wrong.
But - in this manner some of us learns something.

Yet - you still answered my email - in our little deabte on who is right or 
wrong - did you not?


from
M. Sufilight


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John" <GodLovesEveryone.org@gmail.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World theosophical books in disguise?


> >But if the truth is, that - if - you are saying
> >HPB is right and "to be a child-molester is wrong".
> >"To be a child-molester is right" and HPB is wrong - I would say that I
> >certainly DO NOT find that amusing !!!
>
> Every person on Earth has some evil in their background. I once
> (unintentionally) tried to murder someone, back when I didn't know the
> harm of throwing a rock at someone. (Yes, my parents paid that child's
> medical bills). Each of us have something that we wish we hadn't done,
> but I wouldn't go back into the past and change my past, because I
> believe that every positive AND NEGATIVE experience in my past has
> contributed to make me the better person that I am today.
>
> My point is that, in spite of what CWL (probably but allegedly) did,
> there may be some good in what he wrote, if you look for it.
>
> Likewise, in spite of what HPB (probably but allegedly) did, there may
> be some good in what she wrote, if you look for it.
>
> And ... what you find good in one person's writing may not match what
> someone else finds good in that same person's writings.
>
> I am not going to say that a person is 100% wrong because of one or even
> 100 incidents. Likewise, I am not going to say that another person is
> 100% good because of incidents of a completely different nature.
>
> I completely agree that it is right for you to decide that one person is
> completely wrong for you. I just disagree with your perception that it
> is okay for you to judge that a particular writing is wrong for me.
>
> Please note that the purpose of my response is NOT to compare HPB and
> CWL. Put any two names into this document, and my comparisons are still
> valid.
> --
> John, webmaster
> www.GodLovesEveryone.org and www.MAZES.com
>
> FLASH *** FLASH *** FLASH
>
> More than 38 thousand different GOD LOVES YOU puzzles.
> Each maze has a different first name
> Each maze has a different unique solution
>
> Find your first name here:
> http://www.godloveseveryone.org/god-loves-name.htm
>
> Put our amazing "search box" on your web page. Details
> @ http://www.godloveseveryone.org/god-loves-name.htm
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links