Theos-Talk Archives (December 2005 Message tt00053)

Sorry for this long overdue response -- since I am still culling through all 
the unfinished letters left behind since the end of last year when my mailbox 
started filling at the rate of about 50 e-mail's per day... And the pileup of 
partially finished answers waiting to be sent began to accumulate 
accordingly... Not to mention that in the past 6 months I've been in and out of hospitals, 
first with Legionella pneumonia in NY -- which I barely survived... And 
then, after going to Florida to recuperate, spending another four weeks in a 
hospital being mended and recovering from a serious auto accident. I'm still under 
rehab therapy for lots of fractures and debilitated musculature, and doubt if 
I'll ever get back to my 5 floor walkup in NYC.:-( However, since my 
landlord had offered to buy out my rent stabilized lease, I may take him up on it 
and move permanently to Florida -- where most of my supportive family lives. At 
my advanced age, living alone and partially disavbled, it might be the wise 
thing to do.

***************************

In a message dated 03/04/05 10:40:16 AM, GregLaGana writes:

>Lenny - I think I'm starting to get an inkling of a picture of what you
>are talking about with this "ABC" theory of yours. However, I must say
>that if this is supposed to be the simplified explanation, I'd hate to
>see the complicated one.

LM: 
Try reading the *Secret Doctrine* by H. P. Blavatsky which covers the same 
stuff in 1600+ pages of much greater density. (Incidentally, that took me 
over ten years to wade through, plus another ten of meditating on it, to get a 
more or less clear indication of the most likely true nature of fundamental 
reality. :-) 

>Visually, the sheer number of words, as well as the specialized references
> you make (M-brane/String theory, "Spinergy," etc.) you use in describing
>this just appears dense -- almost impenetrable. But as I was reading it
>and thinking that -- i.e.. the way the words appeared visually on the page,
>I began wondering if this could be made into some kind of animated cartoon
>story -- perhaps narrated -- sort of like Brian Green's "Elegant Universe"
>program on PBS.
>
>Or maybe I'm just being dense & lazy myself here.
>
>Anyway, thanks for sharing this. I will keep trying to unfold it in my
>own consciousness.
>
>Regards, Greg
>

Hi Greg,

You're right. The stuff I sent was pretty dense. Actually, it was written 
for scientific forums, composed mostly of working scientists who have been 
trying to pluck my theory apart for years :-). The problem is the many 
different areas of science that this theory covers and tries to bring together into 
one coherent system that reflects what I think is the true nature of 
multidimensional reality. Also, to add to the complexity as well as the difficulty of 
explanation, it includes consciousness -- which science fails to consider as 
being both fundamental and as important as matter in the overall scheme of 
things. For example, in my ABC view, everything (forms of matter) in the 
universe, whether in any of the seven fold fields of hyperspace or configuration 
space (our 3-D metric space-time continuum) -- is conscious -- in one degree of 
complexity of expression or another. 

The main problem is that ABC is actually a complete, philosophically sound, 
scientific theory of everything (although not "falsifiable" according to the 
rules of the "scientific method""). To cover it thoroughly would require at 
least a 100+ page tome to be written for each scientific discipline. Although 
I have a completely clear and scientifically consistent picture of it all in 
my mind -- it would also take enormous amounts of research to correlate all the 
twists and turns of this theory and correlate them with the professional 
literature of each discipline. I don't think I have enough time left to do that 
all by myself.:-) 

Thus, my attempt to wake up the scientific workers on the leading edge of 
string and quantum field theories and their mathematics, as well as those in the 
mind-brain science -- to look at the primal beginning from a new point of view 
that links matter-energy to consciousness (awareness, will, mind, memory, 
etc.) right from the get go. Is it any wonder, then, why my explanations become 
more or less dense for the casual reader? :-)

Actually, in the ABC view, which parallels the theosophical one, both 
consciousness and matter are simply two sides of the same coin... With consciousness 
(awareness-will) being the inherent nature of the zero-point of absolute space 
at the primal beginning (which is everywhere), and matter being the 
mass-energy resulting from the abstract nonlinear spin or angular momentum (G-force or 
Spinergy) of that point. 

This spinning point ultimately emanates linearly as a single ray of space in 
motion, weaves its triune spherical form, and fractally involves like bubbles 
within bubbles within bubbles, etc., at descending phase orders of 
frequency/energy, from near zero to near infinite. Thus, the first universal form is a 
spherical monad of twin inner fields within a surrounding field that further 
involves analogously into an octaval series of seven fold fields within fields 
within fields, ad infinitum. Thus, all these fields are coadunate but not 
consubstantial, as they descend from one spatial dimension to another. 

When this macrocosmic triune monadic field involves further, and ultimately, 
after its formation of the physical plane continues to evolve into sentient 
beings, it eventually reflects itself in the human monad -- which is the basic 
model of all intra and interconnected fields of spirit, mind and matter (that 
conventional physics, being based on materialism, sees only as particles linked 
together with fundamental forces that they can only explain mathematically 
and test empirically). Unfortunately, by limiting their epistemological 
empiricism to what can only be measured or observed by instruments composed of the 
same level of substantial forms and energetic fields they are measuring or 
observing, they completely miss the boat in consistently explaining the entire 
subjective inner and objective outer nature of the Universe and linking them 
together as two sides of a single coin. 

As for the ABC theory... It's simply a deductively reasonable geometric and 
topologically consistent attempt to correlate all the complexities of 
theosophical metaphysics, which coherently explains everything from universal origin 
and cosmogenesis to mankind and its anthropogenesis... By consolidated it into 
one scientific paradigm -- that, while consistent with all currently proven 
quantum and relativity theories as well as the superstring theories that 
consolidate their incompatibility (i.e. neither able to commonly explain gravity, 
the cause of consciousness, the binding of brain to mind, or come up with a 
Unified Field Theory, etc.) -- also encompasses the ideas of a "holographic 
paradigm" proposed by David Bohm and Karl Pribram... i.e., The universe is an 
entirely holographic system with both implicate and explicate orders comparable to 
the matter-spirit duality of theosophical metaphysics... That ultimately 
resolves -- analogously and correspondingly on all the manifest metaphysical and 
physical planes or levels, as it descends from one frequency-energy field phase 
order to another -- into a trinity of matter, mind, and consciousness... With 
all of it based on one fundamental law of cycles and periodicity inherent in 
the original spin of the primal zero-point (or "singularity") of Cosmic 
Origin... As well as reflected in each zero-point, spread out everywhere throughout 
all phases of multidimensional space, and individually located at both the pole 
junctures between and at the centers of every coadunate but not consubstantial 
spherical field of consciousness within every analogous hyperspace and 
physical space dimensionality. (See field diagrams below)

Well, that's about as simple as I can get it. With carefully focussed 
thought, it is also simple (with practice) to visualize all this, symbolically, in 
cross section as 2-d and 3-d transparent images in the mind. (Forgive the 
long diatribe in answer to your simple question, but each time I write about 
this theoretical model helps me clarify it in my mind a bit further, and I become 
fascinated in trying to picture its multidimensionality in words alone. 

In any event, I hope this outline might clarify things a bit further and that 
your "inkling" results in a deeper understanding. It might help also to see 
the diagrams I've posted on the web and try to comprehend how they 
symbolically relate to the word pictures above, as well as to my ABC site** that 
attempts to explain the fundamental basis of ABC, the rationale behind it, and its 
relationship to visual perception in more or less greater detail.

http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/TaiChiFldDiag-figure-2.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Chakrafielddiag-fig.col.jpg
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/BuddhaBabyGordianKnot.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
** http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics

I've also been thinking of an animated version of the theoretical model that 
would make it much simpler to understand. Interesting that you refer to 
Brian Greene's Nova series -- since Superstring/M-brane theory is the closest that 
science and mathematics has come to explaining the material side of the ABC 
theory. However, without the connection of their "hyperspace" fields and 
their "strings" and "membranes" with awareness and will at the zero-point, they 
have no way of explaining how perceptive consciousness, from sensory imagery, 
through imaginative imagery, to dream imagery, actually works, and how these 
internal images link up with the kinesthetic body model that allows a baseball 
fielder to catch a fly ball on the run.

>From the standpoint of ABC, however, it's as simple as abc. :-) 

This model explains such subjective or inner perceived "things" as being 
encoded "information" in the form of holographic image interference patterns -- 
carried on the surfaces of the interpenetrating hyperspace fields -- that are 
reconstructed holographically by a coherent ray of inner or astral light 
projected from the zero-point centers of awareness-will on the astral field level of 
mind and memory... Empowered by our self directed intent originating in the 
zero-point of individual global awareness on the spiritual level. 

These encoded sensory images are transformed from one field level to another 
by electrical inductive resonance processes, starting with the image-encoded 
and modulated magnetic field produced by the brain. Also, it's obvious that 
the brain's visual cortex field is integrally linked by such processes to the 
kinesthetic cortex field that controls the positions of the body. But all 
that will have to wait for a full explanation until I get the commission to 
produce the ABC computer graphics version of the "Super Elegant Conscious Universe, 
or "How IT ALL Began." (Although, I could explain the entire process in 
exquisite detail with written descriptions of equivalent density or 
transparency.:-) 

But, unfortunately, Astro Biological Coenergetics isn't a recognized 
scientific discipline like String physics. If I had a Ph.D. in any scientific 
discipline, I could write a peer reviewed book on ABC as a new paradigm of physics 
-- which includes consciousness... And, with it, maybe get a sponsored series 
on Nova.:-) 

Other than that remote possibility, I'll just have to wait for a movie 
producer/financier who thinks I might have something worthwhile and interesting to 
say, and can help raise enough money to say it on film. My early work in 
motion pictures as a pioneer in 3-D computer animation, motion capture, and 
digital special effects during the late 70's and early 80's, and prior to that 
producing theatrical quality fully animated films with my patented auto animation 
processes, would certainly help in creating the multidimensional computer 
animated visualizations I already have in mind.

So, thanks or your interest. Let me know if there is anything more you want 
to know about ABC, or if you have any specific questions. I'm still trying to 
simplify it further -- at least from a visual graphic point of view that I 
can explain in words to artists and writers. :-)

Best regards,

Lenny 
http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]