Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00064)

Dear Carlos,

your quarrel makes me laughter as you are playing 
on words.
Daniel is quite right, when he writes that the SPR 
did not declared innocent in 1986.
Harrison did not proof that the Mahatma Letters 
are genuine and the Masters exists, he did only 
proof that Hodgson's charges were not profen.
Don't you see the difference between "guilty" and 
"not profen"?

Where does Harrison proof in his book that the 
Mahatma Letters were written by KH and M.?
I think, nowhere. All he proofs is that HPB did 
not write them.
Frank


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "carlosaveline cardoso aveline" 
<carlosaveline@hotmail.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:48 PM
Subject: Theos-World HPB Declared Innocent by SPR




Daniel,


I will note that in your opinion the SPR did not 
have any charges against
HPB.

And that the SPR did not declare HPB innocent in 
1986.

A surprising view indeed.  I must  recommend you 
and everyone to  read
Vernon Harrison's book on the subject. It seems 
you did not yet.

And also Sylvia Cranston's biography of HPB, which 
discusses the subject.
Very important books indeed, from which every 
sincere student can benefit.


Regards,  Carlos.





>From: "danielhcaldwell" 
><danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Theos-World Re: HPB Declared Innocent
>Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:52:28 -0000
>
>Carlos wrote:
>
>"If the SPR revised and abandoned all its charges
>against HPB, this is tantamount to declare her 
>inocent."
>
>Unless Carlos has information I'm not aware of, 
>the SPR
>did NOT revise and abandon all its charges 
>against
>HPB.
>
>Technically speaking , the SPR as
>a society did NOT have any charges against HPB in 
>the
>first place.  The charges against HPB were made 
>by
>Hodgson and a committee of SPR members.
>
>But see also Leslie Price's relevant comments at:
>
>http://blavatskyfoundation.org/obitpric.htm
>
>But it was certainly significant that in 1986 the 
>SPR
>journal published Harrison's report.
>
>Walter Carrither's book and Harrison's book 
>certainly
>call into question many of the major charges made 
>against
>HPB by Hodgson.
>
>But each reader, student, interested inquirer 
>will have to decide
>for himself (herself) the validity of Hodgson's 
>original charges
>and the rebuttals by Carrithers, Harrison and 
>other defenders of
>HPB.
>
>Some of my own thinking on the matter can be 
>found at:
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/mahatmasapparitions.htm
>
>especially in Footnote 1 at:
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/mahatmasapparitions.htm#1
>
>For example, interested readers should compare 
>and contrast
>Henry Olcott's testimony about his encounters 
>with the Masters
>at:
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/olcottandmahatmas.htm
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/olcottaccounts.htm
>
>with the testimony of Coulomb and Hodgson at:
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/coulombandhodgson.htm
>
>I would think that the perceptive reader of this 
>material might
>see some glaring differences.....
>
>Daniel
>http://hpb.cc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Facilite sua vida: Use o Windows Desktop Search e 
encontre qualquer arquivo
ou e-mail em seu PC. Acesse: 
http://desktop.msn.com.br




Yahoo! Groups Links


    theos-talk-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com